Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

ci: Introduce a new `.default-utils-before_script` CI definition

Merged Rémy Coutable requested to merge introduce-default-utils-ci-definition into master

What does this MR do and why?

This reduces some duplication in our CI/CD config.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Edited by Rémy Coutable

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • assigned to @rymai

  • Rémy Coutable changed milestone to %15.5

    changed milestone to %15.5

  • Rémy Coutable added 5 commits

    added 5 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖 resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Suggested Reviewers (beta)

    The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.

    You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign /assign_reviewer @user1.

    Suggested Reviewers
    @rymai, @rspeicher, @ntepluhina, @tkuah, @mayra-cabrera

    If you do not believe these suggestions are useful, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923.

    Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot - an experimental ML-based recommendation engine created by ~"group::applied ml".

  • A deleted user added frontend label

    added frontend label

  • Pipeline Changes

    This merge request contains changes to the pipeline configuration for the GitLab project.

    Please consider the effect of the changes in this merge request on the following:

    Please consider communicating these changes to the broader team following the communication guideline for pipeline changes

    Reviewer roulette

    Changes that require review have been detected!

    Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

    Category Reviewer Maintainer
    frontend Lee Tickett (@leetickett-gitlab) (UTC+1, same timezone as @rymai) Kushal Pandya (@kushalpandya) (UTC+5.5, 4.5 hours ahead of @rymai)
    maintenanceworkflow / maintenancepipelines for CI, Danger Lee Tickett (@leetickett-gitlab) (UTC+1, same timezone as @rymai) Alexandru Croitor (@acroitor) (UTC+3, 2 hours ahead of @rymai)

    To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

    To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

    Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

    If needed, you can retry the :repeat: danger-review job that generated this comment.

    Generated by :no_entry_sign: Danger

    Edited by Ghost User
  • Allure report

    allure-report-publisher generated test report!

    e2e-review-qa: :exclamation: test report for ff579fcb

    expand test summary
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |                                     suites summary                                      |
    +------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
    |                                    | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
    +------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
    | Create                             | 28     | 0      | 1       | 0     | 29    | ✅     |
    | Plan                               | 47     | 0      | 1       | 0     | 48    | ✅     |
    | Manage                             | 52     | 0      | 8       | 2     | 60    | ❗     |
    | Verify                             | 12     | 0      | 1       | 0     | 13    | ✅     |
    | Secure                             | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
    | Package                            | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
    | Feature flag handler sanity checks | 9      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
    | Version sanity check               | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
    | Configure                          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
    | Govern                             | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
    +------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
    | Total                              | 152    | 0      | 14      | 2     | 166   | ❗     |
    +------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

    e2e-package-and-test: :x: test report for ff579fcb

    expand test summary
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |                              suites summary                               |
    +----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
    |                      | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
    +----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
    | Plan                 | 297    | 0      | 0       | 0     | 297   | ✅     |
    | Secure               | 115    | 0      | 5       | 0     | 120   | ✅     |
    | Create               | 823    | 0      | 37      | 0     | 860   | ✅     |
    | Manage               | 472    | 0      | 65      | 0     | 537   | ✅     |
    | Verify               | 221    | 0      | 42      | 0     | 263   | ✅     |
    | Fulfillment          | 10     | 0      | 70      | 0     | 80    | ✅     |
    | Release              | 20     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 20    | ✅     |
    | Package              | 144    | 0      | 33      | 0     | 177   | ✅     |
    | Configure            | 1      | 0      | 15      | 0     | 16    | ✅     |
    | Govern               | 14     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 14    | ✅     |
    | Analytics            | 11     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 11    | ✅     |
    | Protect              | 3      | 2      | 0       | 0     | 5     | ❌     |
    | GitLab Metrics       | 2      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 3     | ✅     |
    | SSH keys support     | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
    | Systems              | 3      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 3     | ✅     |
    | Data Stores          | 12     | 0      | 1       | 0     | 13    | ✅     |
    | Version sanity check | 0      | 0      | 7       | 0     | 7     | ➖     |
    +----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
    | Total                | 2150   | 2      | 276     | 0     | 2428  | ❌     |
    +----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
    Edited by Ghost User
  • Rémy Coutable added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 0dd5a48e - ci: Introduce a new `.default-utils-before_script` CI definition

    Compare with previous version

  • Rémy Coutable changed the description

    changed the description

  • Rémy Coutable added 690 commits

    added 690 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Author Maintainer

    @godfat-gitlab Could you please review? Thanks! :pray_tone2:

  • requested review from @godfat-gitlab

  • Rémy Coutable changed milestone to %15.6

    changed milestone to %15.6

  • @rymai Thank you, looks good to me!

  • Lin Jen-Shin approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • :wave: @godfat-gitlab, thanks for approving this merge request.

    This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

    For more info, please refer to the following links:

  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
Please register or sign in to reply
Loading