Skip to content

Follow-up from "Draft: Get rid of stack type in interpreter errors"

The following discussion from !4809 (closed) should be addressed:

  • @mbouaziz started a discussion: (+1 comment)

    Sorry I think I mistook stack traces for stack type traces.

    The type is useless but the content is not. I will close the MR.

    But:

    • no gas change was expected, I need to investigate on why we got one
    • no other change was revealed by the change, where one was expected, I need to add tests
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information