Use Claude 3 Sonnet for Duo Chat Zero Shot

What does this MR do and why?

• This is behind a feature flag for testing
• Uses request body format needed for messages API, which is now supported by the AI Gateway: gitlab-org/modelops/applied-ml/code-suggestions/ai-assist!668 (merged)
• #444629 (closed)

MR acceptance checklist

Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

Before	After

How to set up and validate locally

1. In rails console enable the feature flag fully

   Feature.enable(:ai_claude_3_sonnet)

2. Set up the AI Gateway locally
3. Ask Duo Chat questions in your GDK

changed milestone to %16.11

added Category:Duo Chat backend devopsai-powered groupai framework missed:16.10 sectiondata-science typemaintenance workflowin dev labels

assigned to @jessieay

changed the description

added feature flag label

	1 Warning
	ed8d3d56: The commit subject must start with a capital letter. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.

	1 Message
	CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	@mc_rocha (UTC-4, same timezone as author)	@harsimarsandhu (UTC+2, 6 hours ahead of author)

Please check reviewer's status!

• Reviewer is available!
• Reviewer is unavailable!

Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

added 1 commit

• b7fcc97a - Cleanup

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

Self-review note (non-blocking): re: the whitespace changes in the various Tools::*::Executor classes:

Claude 3 returns Tool responses with ActionInput but the ChainOfThoughtParser expects Action Input (with a space) so I had to make this change. Manual runs show that Claude 2 always returns Action Input even without this whitespace change but Claude 3 requires the change to return things as expected.

GitLab Duo Chat QA evaluation

Report generated for "rspec-ee unit gitlab-duo-chat-qa pg14". This report is generated and refreshed automatically. Do not edit.

LLMs have been asked to evaluate GitLab Duo Chat's answers.

: LLM evaluated the answer as CORRECT.

: LLM evaluated the answer as INCORRECT.

: LLM did not evaluate correctly or the evaluation request might have failed.

Summary

• The total number of evaluations: 38

• The number of evaluations in which all LLMs graded CORRECT: 0 (0.0%)

  • Note: if an evaluation request failed or its response was not parsable, it was ignored. For example, would count as CORRECT.

• The number of evaluations in which all LLMs graded INCORRECT: 38 (100.0%)

  • Note: if an evaluation request failed or its response was not parsable, it was ignored. For example, would count as INCORRECT.

• The number of evaluations in which LLMs disagreed: 0 (0.0%)

Evaluations

"Are there any open questions relating to this issue? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371038"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to score the student's answer as either CORRECT or INCORRECT, but does not provide the actual answer or any criteria for evaluating the student's response. Without knowing the details of what constitutes a correct answer, I cannot reliably judge whether the student's response is accurate or not. Please provide additional information about the expected answer so I can attempt to grade the student's response.
text-bison

"Are there any open questions relating to this issue? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415547"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The context provides details about a GitLab issue titled "BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue". The issue describes adding support to associate legacy GitLab issues with Epic work items, which are being migrated to a new work item system. This is needed as part of a larger epic to migrate epics to work items. The question asks if there are any open questions related to this issue. The student's answer does not seem to attempt to address the question asked. Instead, the student asks for better instructions. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student did not attempt to answer the question of whether there are any open questions related to the GitLab issue described in the context. Asking for better instructions does not address the question that was asked. Therefore, the answer is incorrect. To receive full credit, the student would need to analyze the context and issue details to determine if there are any outstanding questions, or state that there is no information provided to determine that.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks if there are any open questions relating to the issue, while the student's answer states that they don't see how they can help and requests better instructions.

"Can you create a simpler list of which questions a user should be able to ask according to this epic."

(context: gitlab-org&10694)

Resource

gitlab-org&10694

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asked the student to create a simpler list of which questions a user should be able to ask according to the given epic. However, the student's response does not attempt to answer the question asked. Instead, the student asks for better instructions. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question based on the given context, the answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer is not related to the context. The context is about adjusting work items permission, while the student's answer is about not understanding the instructions.

"Can you create a simpler list of which questions a user should be able to ask according to this epic."

(context: gitlab-org&10814)

Resource

gitlab-org&10814

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough information to provide a step-by-step explanation for grading this student answer. The question asks to create a simpler list of questions a user should be able to ask based on the given context, but the student answer does not attempt to provide such a list. Without an actual student answer to grade, the best I can do is: Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student did not provide a list of questions as asked in the original question. More specific explanation cannot be provided without a substantive student answer to evaluate.
text-bison

"Could you summarize this issue"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to summarize an issue, but does not provide the actual summary to compare the student's response against. Without knowing the expected answer, I cannot reliably judge if the student's response is correct or incorrect. Please provide the full context including the desired summary so I can accurately grade the response.
text-bison

"Could you summarize this issue"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#412831)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#412831

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":128440335,"title":"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items","author_id":3860200,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-05-24T09:55:52.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.928Z","description":"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\n\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets checks update_work_item permission when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\n\n### Steps to replicate\n\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\n\nScreen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13","milestone_id":2969682,"iid":412831,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":0,"title_html":"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items","description_html":"\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:149\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eA user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:305\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets \u003ca data-sourcepos=\"3:81-3:217\" href=\"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13\"\u003echecks \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"3:90-3:105\"\u003eupdate_work_item\u003c/code\u003e permission\u003c/a\u003e when this particular widget requires the more lenient \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"3:274-3:292\"\u003eupdate_subscription\u003c/code\u003e permission.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3 data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:22\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-steps-to-replicate\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#steps-to-replicate\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSteps to replicate\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cul data-sourcepos=\"7:1-11:0\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003cli data-sourcepos=\"7:1-7:131\"\u003eLog in as a \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"7:16-7:20\"\u003eGuest\u003c/code\u003e user and visit an issue in the project, for example \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"7:76-7:130\"\u003ehttps://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1\u003c/code\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli data-sourcepos=\"8:1-8:76\"\u003eThe user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli data-sourcepos=\"9:1-9:121\"\u003eVisit the same issue using the work item view for example \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"9:62-9:120\"\u003ehttps://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1\u003c/code\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli data-sourcepos=\"10:1-11:0\"\u003eThe option to toggle notifications is not displayed\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"12:1-12:129\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"media-container video-container\"\u003e\u003cvideo src=\"/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov\" controls=\"true\" data-setup=\"{}\" data-title=\"Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13\" preload=\"metadata\" width=\"400\"\u003e\u003c/video\u003e\u003ca href=\"/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" title=\"Download 'Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13'\"\u003eScreen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466693,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":null,"last_edited_by_id":null,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-07-31T08:59:23.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":0,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not attempt to summarize the issue described in the context. It asks for better instructions instead. Since the student did not have access to the full context, any answer would be incorrect. But even without the full context, the student should have attempted some kind of summary instead of asking for more instructions.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the issue, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"How can I improve the description of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371038 so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks how the description of an issue can be improved, but the context provided is simply the content of the issue itself. There is no student answer attempting to improve the description. Without a proposed improvement to the description from the student, I cannot assess whether their answer is correct or incorrect. I would need the student to provide a suggested edit to the issue description in order to grade their response. Please provide an actual student answer proposing changes to the issue description for me to evaluate.
text-bison

"How can I improve the description of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415547 so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize_context {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The context describes an issue titled "BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue". The issue is part of an epic to migrate epics to work items. It discusses needing to associate legacy issues as children of epic work items until issues are also migrated to work items. The question asks how to improve the description so readers understand the value and problems to be solved. The student answer does not attempt to address the question asked. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not attempt to improve the issue description to help readers understand the value and problems to be solved. It asks for better instructions instead. Since the student did not answer the question asked based on the context provided, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer is incorrect because it does not address the question of how to improve the description of the issue. The student simply states that they do not see how they can help and asks for better instructions.

"How can I improve the description of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416800 so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#416800)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#416800

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not attempt to improve the description of the issue as asked in the question. The student asks for better instructions instead of providing suggestions to improve the issue description. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question that was asked, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question of how to improve the description of the issue. Instead, it states that the student does not see how they can help and requests better instructions.

"How much work is left to be done https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550?"

(context: gitlab-org&10550)

Resource

gitlab-org&10550

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize ${context} Based on the context provided, the epic tracks the work to bring the GitLab Duo Chat system to Beta. This includes: Building the backend where the heavy lifting is done Building the WebUI frontend Supporting clients other than the WebUI like IDEs It covers features like: Answering questions about code, issues, epics, etc. Enabling conversational capabilities Getting user feedback on answers It also sets some quality bars around: User satisfaction rates Speed of answers Error tracking The student said they don't have enough instructions to help. But the context provides a lot of details on what the epic is about. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The context provides plenty of information to summarize what the epic is about, including the overall scope, features supported, and success criteria. The student should have been able to provide some kind of summary instead of saying they didn't have enough instructions.
text-bison

"How much work is left to be done https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10694?"

(context: gitlab-org&10694)

Resource

gitlab-org&10694

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":835460,"group_id":9970,"author_id":3860200,"assignee_id":null,"iid":10694,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"updated_by_id":3860200,"last_edited_by_id":null,"lock_version":1,"start_date":"2023-05-18","end_date":"2023-08-17","last_edited_at":null,"created_at":"2023-05-24T10:02:12.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:09.477Z","title":"Work items permission adjustments","title_html":"Work items permission adjustments","description":"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.","description_html":"\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:154\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eWe have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\u003c/p\u003e","start_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969659,"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969682,"start_date_fixed":null,"due_date_fixed":null,"start_date_is_fixed":false,"due_date_is_fixed":false,"closed_by_id":null,"closed_at":null,"parent_id":null,"relative_position":null,"state_id":1,"start_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"due_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"confidential":false,"external_key":null,"color":"#1068bf","total_opened_issue_weight":0,"total_closed_issue_weight":8,"total_opened_issue_count":0,"total_closed_issue_count":5,"issue_id":null} The context provides details about an epic to track issues related to differences in permission checks between issues and work items for users with guest access. The student's answer does not attempt to address the question asked. It simply states an inability to help and asks for better instructions. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question based on the context provided, the answer is incorrect. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The context provides details about an epic to track permission check issues between issues and work items. The student's answer does not attempt to address the question and instead asks for better instructions. As the student did not try to answer the question using the context, the answer is marked incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks about the amount of work left to be done for a specific GitLab epic, while the student's answer expresses frustration and requests better instructions.

"How much work is left to be done https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10814?"

(context: gitlab-org&10814)

Resource

gitlab-org&10814

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough information to accurately grade the student's answer. The question asks "How much work is left to be done" on the GitLab epic, but does not provide the expected answer or scoring criteria. Without knowing the specific information sought or how to evaluate the student's response, I cannot reliably determine if their answer is correct or incorrect. I would need more details on what constitutes a sufficient, factually accurate answer to this question in order to provide a fair grade and explanation. Please provide the true/model answer, or additional details on how student responses should be assessed. Grade: N/A Explanation: Not enough information provided to accurately grade response.
text-bison

"How much work is left to be done in this epic?"

(context: gitlab-org&10694)

Resource

gitlab-org&10694

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":835460,"group_id":9970,"author_id":3860200,"assignee_id":null,"iid":10694,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"updated_by_id":3860200,"last_edited_by_id":null,"lock_version":1,"start_date":"2023-05-18","end_date":"2023-08-17","last_edited_at":null,"created_at":"2023-05-24T10:02:12.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:09.477Z","title":"Work items permission adjustments","title_html":"Work items permission adjustments","description":"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.","description_html":"\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:154\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eWe have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\u003c/p\u003e","start_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969659,"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969682,"start_date_fixed":null,"due_date_fixed":null,"start_date_is_fixed":false,"due_date_is_fixed":false,"closed_by_id":null,"closed_at":null,"parent_id":null,"relative_position":null,"state_id":1,"start_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"due_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"confidential":false,"external_key":null,"color":"#1068bf","total_opened_issue_weight":0,"total_closed_issue_weight":8,"total_opened_issue_count":0,"total_closed_issue_count":5,"issue_id":null} The context provides details about an epic to track work items permission adjustments. The question asks "How much work is left to be done in this epic?". However, the student answer does not attempt to answer the question and instead asks for better instructions. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question based on the provided context, I will grade this as incorrect. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The context provides details about an epic to track work items permission adjustments. The question asks "How much work is left to be done in this epic?". However, the student answer does not attempt to answer the question and instead asks for better instructions. Since the student did not use the context to answer the question, the answer is graded as incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks about the amount of work left to be done in the epic, while the student's answer expresses frustration and requests better instructions.

"How much work is left to be done in this epic?"

(context: gitlab-org&10814)

Resource

gitlab-org&10814

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough information to accurately grade the student's answer. The question asks "How much work is left to be done in this epic?" but does not provide the full context needed to determine the correct answer. The context provided seems to be details about the epic itself rather than information to quantify the remaining work. Without knowing what comprises the total scope of work for this epic or how to calculate progress based on the information given, I cannot reliably assess if the student's response is correct or incorrect. Providing additional details on how to evaluate the status of the epic would be needed for me to grade this question. Since I lack the full context to grade this properly, I will abstain from providing a grade. Please provide more complete information on what is needed to accurately determine the answer, and I would be happy to assess the student response. Grade: Explanation: Unable to grade due to insufficient information. More details needed on how to evaluate status of the epic to determine the correct answer.
text-bison

"How much work is left to be done in this epic?"

(context: gitlab-org&10550)

Resource

gitlab-org&10550

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize ${context} Based on the context provided, the student's answer does not attempt to summarize the work left to be done in the epic. The question asks "How much work is left to be done in this epic?" but the student's response indicates they don't understand the instructions. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not attempt to summarize the work left to be done as asked in the question. It simply states that the instructions are unclear. Since the answer does not address summarizing the work left in the epic, it is incorrect.
text-bison

"Please rewrite the description of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371038 so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common "jobs to be done" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective."

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough information to properly grade the student's answer. The question asks to rewrite the issue description to help readers understand the value and problems being solved, but the student's response does not attempt to rewrite the description. Without seeing the student's attempt at rewriting the description, I cannot assess whether it would be correct or not. To provide a fair grade and explanation, I would need to see the specifics of what the student wrote in trying to rewrite the description, rather than just a statement that they don't know how to help. Perhaps the instructions could be clarified to ask the student to provide their rewritten description, rather than asking if they can help. Then I could compare their attempt to the key elements that should be included and provide a grade and targeted explanation. But with the information given, I do not have an adequate basis to judge the accuracy of the response. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: No rewrite of the description is provided to grade on accuracy. Instructions may need to be clarified.
text-bison

"Please rewrite the description of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831 so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common "jobs to be done" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective."

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#412831)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#412831

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's response does not attempt to rewrite the description or add any common use cases. The instructions asked to rewrite the description to help readers understand the value and problems to be solved, as well as add common "jobs to be done" or use cases from a usability perspective. Since the student did not attempt this, I have graded their response as incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks the student to rewrite the description of an issue on GitLab, but the student's answer simply states that they don't see how they can help and asks for better instructions.

"Please rewrite the description of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415547 so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common "jobs to be done" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective."

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The instructions asked the student to rewrite the issue description to help readers understand the value and problems to be solved, as well as add common use cases that should be considered from a usability perspective. However, the student did not attempt to rewrite the description or add any use cases. Instead, they stated that they did not understand the instructions. Since the student did not follow the instructions and did not provide the requested rewrite or use cases, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks the student to rewrite the description of an issue, while the student's answer states that they do not see how they can help and requests better instructions.

"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#17800)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#17800

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not attempt to summarize the issue as asked in the question. The student asks for better instructions instead of providing a summary. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question that was asked, their response should be marked as incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the latest activity and current status of the issue, but the student's answer simply states that they don't see how they can help and asks for better instructions.

"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371038"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to summarize the latest activity and current status of an issue, but no details about the issue or its status are provided. Without access to that key information from the context, there is no way for me to assess if the student's response is correct or incorrect. I would need the full context containing the details about the issue in order to provide an accurate grade and explanation. Please provide the necessary context details if you would like me to grade the response.
text-bison

"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#412831)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#412831

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asked the student to summarize the latest activity and current status of the GitLab issue. However, the student's response does not attempt to summarize the issue and instead asks for better instructions. Since the student did not provide a summary as requested, the answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the latest activity and current status of the issue, but the student's answer simply states that they don't know how to help and asks for better instructions.

"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415547"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} Based on the context provided, this issue is about adding support to associate legacy issues as children of epic work items during the migration of epics to work items. Key details: Part of a larger epic (#9290 (closed)) to migrate epics to work items Need to associate legacy issues as children of epic work items since migration happening before legacy issues also become work items This is a temporary solution until issues also become work items, then can use hierarchy widget for relationships Issue was created on June 16, 2023 Issue was closed on September 11, 2023 Currently has 1 blocking issue The student answer does not attempt to summarize the issue or provide any details from the context. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not summarize the issue or provide any accurate details from the context, so it is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the latest activity and current status of the issue, but the student's answer simply states that they don't see how they can help and asks for better instructions.

"Please summarize what the objective and next steps are for https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550"

(context: gitlab-org&10550)

Resource

gitlab-org&10550

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to accurately grade the student's answer or provide an explanation. The question asks to summarize the objectives and next steps for an epic, but no information is provided about what the actual objectives and next steps are for comparison. Without access to that expected content, I cannot reliably assess whether the student's response is correct or incorrect. I would need the additional context from the epic in order to grade this question and explain the rationale behind the grade. Please provide the required information about the epic's objectives and next steps so I can fully address the grading and explanation as requested.
text-bison

"Please summarize what the objective and next steps are for https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10694"

(context: gitlab-org&10694)

Resource

gitlab-org&10694

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":835460,"group_id":9970,"author_id":3860200,"assignee_id":null,"iid":10694,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"updated_by_id":3860200,"last_edited_by_id":null,"lock_version":1,"start_date":"2023-05-18","end_date":"2023-08-17","last_edited_at":null,"created_at":"2023-05-24T10:02:12.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:09.477Z","title":"Work items permission adjustments","title_html":"Work items permission adjustments","description":"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.","description_html":"\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:154\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eWe have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\u003c/p\u003e","start_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969659,"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969682,"start_date_fixed":null,"due_date_fixed":null,"start_date_is_fixed":false,"due_date_is_fixed":false,"closed_by_id":null,"closed_at":null,"parent_id":null,"relative_position":null,"state_id":1,"start_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"due_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"confidential":false,"external_key":null,"color":"#1068bf","total_opened_issue_weight":0,"total_closed_issue_weight":8,"total_opened_issue_count":0,"total_closed_issue_count":5,"issue_id":null} Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not attempt to summarize the objective and next steps for the epic as asked in the question. Instead, the student asks for better instructions. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question that was asked, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the objective and next steps for the given URL, but the student's answer expresses confusion and requests better instructions.

"Please summarize what the objective and next steps are for https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10814"

(context: gitlab-org&10814)

Resource

gitlab-org&10814

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough information to properly grade the student's answer. The question asks to summarize the objectives and next steps for the epic, but no summary was provided in the student's response or the context. Without a reference summary to compare to, I cannot accurately assess if the student's answer is correct or incorrect. I would kindly ask for a summary of the objectives and next steps to be provided so that the student's response can be properly evaluated. Please let me know if any additional details would be helpful. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: No summary provided in student answer or context to evaluate against. More information needed to grade this question.
text-bison

"Summarize the comments into bullet points?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#416800)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#416800

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize_bullet_points ${context} The student answer does not attempt to summarize the context into bullet points. Since the question asks to summarize the comments into bullet points, and the student did not provide any bullet points, I will grade this as incorrect. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asked the student to summarize the comments into bullet points. However, the student answer does not contain any bullet points or attempt to summarize the information. It simply states that the student does not understand the instructions. As the question specifically asked for a summary in bullet points, the lack of any bullet points or summary means the answer cannot be considered correct.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question of summarizing the comments into bullet points. Instead, the student expresses frustration and asks for better instructions.

"Summarize the comments into bullet points?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to summarize the comments into bullet points, but the context provided is a long description about lines of code metrics without any comments to summarize. Without the necessary context of what comments need to be summarized, I cannot assess if the student's response is correct or incorrect. Please provide the full context needed to grade the response.
text-bison

"Summarize the comments into bullet points?"

(context: gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#34345)

Resource

gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#34345

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize ${context} The student's answer does not attempt to summarize the comments into bullet points. Since the student does not have access to the full context, I cannot properly grade their answer. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not attempt to summarize the comments into bullet points as asked in the question. The student states they do not have enough information to answer properly. Without access to the full context, I cannot accurately grade the factual accuracy of their response.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question of summarizing the comments into bullet points. Instead, it expresses frustration and requests better instructions.

"Summarize the comments into bullet points?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The context provided is a detailed description of an issue being tracked in a project management system. It contains a lot of detailed metadata about the issue. The question asks to summarize this into bullet points. However, the student answer does not attempt to summarize the context and instead asks for better instructions. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asks to summarize the context into bullet points. The student answer does not attempt to summarize the context and instead asks for better instructions. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question using the provided context, the answer is incorrect. Grade: INCORRECT
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the comments, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"Summarize the comments into bullet points?"

(context: gitlab-org&10694)

Resource

gitlab-org&10694

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":835460,"group_id":9970,"author_id":3860200,"assignee_id":null,"iid":10694,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"updated_by_id":3860200,"last_edited_by_id":null,"lock_version":1,"start_date":"2023-05-18","end_date":"2023-08-17","last_edited_at":null,"created_at":"2023-05-24T10:02:12.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:09.477Z","title":"Work items permission adjustments","title_html":"Work items permission adjustments","description":"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.","description_html":"\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:154\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eWe have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\u003c/p\u003e","start_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969659,"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969682,"start_date_fixed":null,"due_date_fixed":null,"start_date_is_fixed":false,"due_date_is_fixed":false,"closed_by_id":null,"closed_at":null,"parent_id":null,"relative_position":null,"state_id":1,"start_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"due_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"confidential":false,"external_key":null,"color":"#1068bf","total_opened_issue_weight":0,"total_closed_issue_weight":8,"total_opened_issue_count":0,"total_closed_issue_count":5,"issue_id":null} Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asks to summarize the comments into bullet points. However, the student answer does not attempt to summarize the comments or provide any bullet points. Instead, the student asks for better instructions. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question as asked, the answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the comments, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"Summarize the comments into bullet points?"

(context: gitlab-org&10814)

Resource

gitlab-org&10814

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The instructions ask me to summarize the comments into bullet points, but no comments are provided. Without access to the necessary context, I cannot accurately assess the correctness of the student's response. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not attempt to summarize any comments into bullet points as asked in the question. However, since I do not have access to the comments that need to be summarized, I cannot confirm if the student's response is actually correct or incorrect. I am grading it as incorrect due to the lack of an attempt to follow the question prompt, but this grade should be considered tentative without the full context.
text-bison

"Summarize this Epic."

(context: gitlab-org&10814)

Resource

gitlab-org&10814

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to summarize the epic, but the student's answer does not attempt to summarize anything. Without seeing the actual epic that the student should have summarized, I cannot determine if their response is correct or incorrect. Please provide the full context needed to grade the response. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: No context provided to grade against.
text-bison

"Summarize this Epic."

(context: gitlab-org&10694)

Resource

gitlab-org&10694

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":835460,"group_id":9970,"author_id":3860200,"assignee_id":null,"iid":10694,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"updated_by_id":3860200,"last_edited_by_id":null,"lock_version":1,"start_date":"2023-05-18","end_date":"2023-08-17","last_edited_at":null,"created_at":"2023-05-24T10:02:12.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:09.477Z","title":"Work items permission adjustments","title_html":"Work items permission adjustments","description":"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.","description_html":"\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:154\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eWe have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\u003c/p\u003e","start_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969659,"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969682,"start_date_fixed":null,"due_date_fixed":null,"start_date_is_fixed":false,"due_date_is_fixed":false,"closed_by_id":null,"closed_at":null,"parent_id":null,"relative_position":null,"state_id":1,"start_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"due_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"confidential":false,"external_key":null,"color":"#1068bf","total_opened_issue_weight":0,"total_closed_issue_weight":8,"total_opened_issue_count":0,"total_closed_issue_count":5,"issue_id":null} Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not attempt to summarize the epic provided in the context. It instead asks for better instructions. To receive a grade of CORRECT, the student would need to provide a summary of the key information from the epic, such as: "This epic tracks issues related to differences in permission checks between issues and work items for users with guest access. It aims to solve those differences over its duration from May 18, 2023 to August 17, 2023." Since the student did not attempt to summarize the epic, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not provide a summary of the epic. Instead, it expresses confusion and requests better instructions.

"Summarize this Issue"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to summarize the issue, but no issue description is provided. The student's response indicates they are confused by the lack of instructions. Without seeing the actual issue description that the student is meant to summarize, I cannot determine if their response is correct or incorrect. Please provide the full context needed to grade the student's response.
text-bison

"Summarize this Issue"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The context provides details about adding support for setting a Work Item as the parent of an Issue in GitLab. This is part of a larger effort to migrate Epics to Work Items. A summary is needed. However, the student answer does not attempt to summarize the context and instead asks for better instructions. This indicates the student did not have access to the full context or did not read it fully. <function_calls> <tool_name>summarize</tool_name> This issue is about adding the ability to set a Work Item as the parent of a legacy Issue in GitLab. This is part of a larger effort to migrate Epics to Work Items. It's needed because the Epic to Work Item migration will happen before the Issue to Work Item migration. Once Issues are migrated, parent-child relationships will be handled natively between Work Items. </function_calls> My summary of the key points in the context: Adding support to set a Work Item as parent of a legacy Issue Part of larger Epic to Work Item migration effort Needed as Epic migration happens before Issue migration Once Issues are Work Items, parent-child relationships will be native Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not attempt to summarize the context and instead asks for better instructions. This indicates the student did not have access to the full context or did not read it fully. A correct summary highlighting the key details from the context is provided.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the issue, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"Summarize this Issue"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#412831)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#412831

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":128440335,"title":"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items","author_id":3860200,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-05-24T09:55:52.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.928Z","description":"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\n\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets checks update_work_item permission when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\n\n### Steps to replicate\n\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\n\nScreen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13","milestone_id":2969682,"iid":412831,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":0,"title_html":"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items","description_html":"\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:149\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eA user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:305\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets \u003ca data-sourcepos=\"3:81-3:217\" href=\"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13\"\u003echecks \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"3:90-3:105\"\u003eupdate_work_item\u003c/code\u003e permission\u003c/a\u003e when this particular widget requires the more lenient \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"3:274-3:292\"\u003eupdate_subscription\u003c/code\u003e permission.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3 data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:22\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-steps-to-replicate\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#steps-to-replicate\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSteps to replicate\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cul data-sourcepos=\"7:1-11:0\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003cli data-sourcepos=\"7:1-7:131\"\u003eLog in as a \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"7:16-7:20\"\u003eGuest\u003c/code\u003e user and visit an issue in the project, for example \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"7:76-7:130\"\u003ehttps://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1\u003c/code\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli data-sourcepos=\"8:1-8:76\"\u003eThe user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli data-sourcepos=\"9:1-9:121\"\u003eVisit the same issue using the work item view for example \u003ccode data-sourcepos=\"9:62-9:120\"\u003ehttps://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1\u003c/code\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli data-sourcepos=\"10:1-11:0\"\u003eThe option to toggle notifications is not displayed\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"12:1-12:129\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"media-container video-container\"\u003e\u003cvideo src=\"/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov\" controls=\"true\" data-setup=\"{}\" data-title=\"Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13\" preload=\"metadata\" width=\"400\"\u003e\u003c/video\u003e\u003ca href=\"/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" title=\"Download 'Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13'\"\u003eScreen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466693,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":null,"last_edited_by_id":null,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-07-31T08:59:23.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":0,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not attempt to summarize the issue described in the context. It asks for better instructions instead. Since the student answer does not summarize the issue based on the context provided, it is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the issue, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"Summarize with bullet points"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to summarize key points from the given context in bullet points, but the student's response does not attempt to summarize anything and instead asks for better instructions. Without seeing the actual summary the student should have provided, I cannot determine if their response is correct or incorrect. Please provide the actual bullet point summary the student should have written so I can compare it to their response and provide an appropriate grade and explanation. Thank you!
text-bison

"Summarize with bullet points"

(context: gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#34345)

Resource

gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#34345

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarizer ${context} The context describes the steps for a trainee frontend maintainer at GitLab to work towards becoming an official maintainer. It includes guidelines like shadowing current maintainers, having maintainers shadow you, finding a mentor, reviewing MRs thoroughly, comparing your reviews to maintainer reviews, and tracking your progress. The student's answer does not attempt to summarize the key points from the context. Instead, it asks for better instructions. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asked the student to summarize the context with bullet points. The student did not attempt to summarize the context and instead asked for better instructions. As the student did not follow the directions and summarize the context, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not provide any useful information related to the question. The student answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"Summarize with bullet points"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize_tool {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The student answer does not attempt to summarize the given context, so it is incorrect. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asked the student to summarize the given context with bullet points. However, the student answer states "I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!". This does not attempt to summarize the context at all. Since the student did not follow the instructions and summarize the context, the answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the context, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"Summarize with bullet points"

(context: gitlab-org&10814)

Resource

gitlab-org&10814

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough information to properly grade the student's answer. The instructions ask me to summarize the given context in bullet points, but the student's answer does not attempt to summarize the context. Instead, the student asks for better instructions. Without an actual attempt at summarizing the context, I cannot accurately judge whether the student's answer is correct or incorrect. I would need to see the student's summary before determining a grade. Therefore, my response is: Grade: NO GRADE Explanation: The student did not attempt to summarize the context, so there is no way to judge if their summary is correct or incorrect. Clear instructions were provided, but the student did not follow them.
text-bison

"Summarize with bullet points"

(context: gitlab-org&10694)

Resource

gitlab-org&10694

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":835460,"group_id":9970,"author_id":3860200,"assignee_id":null,"iid":10694,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"updated_by_id":3860200,"last_edited_by_id":null,"lock_version":1,"start_date":"2023-05-18","end_date":"2023-08-17","last_edited_at":null,"created_at":"2023-05-24T10:02:12.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:09.477Z","title":"Work items permission adjustments","title_html":"Work items permission adjustments","description":"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.","description_html":"\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:154\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eWe have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\u003c/p\u003e","start_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969659,"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id":2969682,"start_date_fixed":null,"due_date_fixed":null,"start_date_is_fixed":false,"due_date_is_fixed":false,"closed_by_id":null,"closed_at":null,"parent_id":null,"relative_position":null,"state_id":1,"start_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"due_date_sourcing_epic_id":null,"confidential":false,"external_key":null,"color":"#1068bf","total_opened_issue_weight":0,"total_closed_issue_weight":8,"total_opened_issue_count":0,"total_closed_issue_count":5,"issue_id":null} Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asked the student to summarize the given context with bullet points. However, the student did not attempt to summarize the context and instead asked for better instructions. Since the student did not provide a summary as requested, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the context in bullet points, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"Summarize with bullet points"

(context: gitlab-org&10550)

Resource

gitlab-org&10550

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize ${context} Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's response does not attempt to summarize the context provided. The instructions asked the student to summarize the context with bullet points. Since the student did not attempt to summarize or provide any bullet points, this answer is incorrect.
text-bison

"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#17800)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#17800

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asks to identify the unique use cases raised by commenters in the given issue. However, the student answer does not attempt to identify any use cases and instead states that they don't understand the instructions. Since the student did not provide any use cases from the issue, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for the unique use cases raised by commenters in the issue, but the student's answer states that they cannot help and requests better instructions.

"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to identify the unique use cases raised by commenters in the given issue, but the context does not contain the full issue or any comments. Without seeing the actual comments and use cases mentioned, there is no way for me to evaluate if the student's response is correct or incorrect. I would need more complete information in the context to properly grade this question.
text-bison

"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize_text {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The context describes an issue tracking adding support for setting a Work Item as the parent of an Issue. The student answer does not attempt to identify any use cases from the context. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asks to identify the unique use cases raised by commenters in the issue. However, the student answer does not identify any use cases from the context and instead asks for better instructions. Since the student did not attempt to answer the question using the provided context, the answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for the unique use cases raised by commenters in the issue, but the student's answer simply states that they don't see how they can help and asks for better instructions.

"What is the status of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#17800)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#17800

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not attempt to grade the question based on the provided context. The context provides details about an issue to add the number of lines of code per language to repository charts in GitLab. However, the student's response says they don't see how they can help and asks for better instructions. Since the student did not attempt to grade the question using the context, their answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question and does not provide any useful information about the status of the issue.

"What is the status of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371038?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to score the student's answer as either CORRECT or INCORRECT, but does not provide the actual answer or any criteria for evaluating the student's response. Without knowing the details of what constitutes a correct answer, I cannot reliably judge whether the student's response is accurate or not. Please provide additional information about the expected answer so I can attempt to grade the student's response.
text-bison

"What is the status of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415547?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The context provides details about a GitLab issue titled "BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue". Key details: Issue #415547 (closed) in the GitLab project with ID 278964 Created on June 16, 2023 Closed on September 11, 2023 Part of epic #9290 (closed) to migrate Epics to Work Items Needs to allow associating a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item The question asks what is the status of this issue. Based on the closed_at date in the context, this issue is currently closed. The student answer does not attempt to determine or state the status of the issue. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asks to state the status of the GitLab issue based on the context details. The student answer does not attempt to determine or state the status of the issue, so it is incorrect. To be correct, the student answer needs to use the context details to state that the issue is currently closed, based on the closed_at date provided.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for the status of the issue, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371038 - Summarize this issue"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks to summarize the GitLab issue provided, but no summary was included in the student's response. Without the actual summary to compare to, I cannot determine if the student's answer is correct or incorrect. Please provide the expected summary so I can grade the response appropriately. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The question asks to summarize the GitLab issue provided in the context. However, the student's response does not attempt to summarize the issue and instead states that the instructions need to be clearer. Since a summary was not provided, the response cannot be considered correct.
text-bison

"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415547 - Summarize this issue"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The context provides details about a GitLab issue to add support for setting a Work Item as the parent of an Issue. The student answer does not attempt to summarize the key details of the issue. Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not summarize the key details of the GitLab issue provided in the context. A correct summary would mention that the issue is to add support for setting a Work Item as the parent of a legacy GitLab Issue, which is needed as part of the migration of Epics to Work Items. The student answer instead asks for better instructions, indicating they did not attempt to summarize the issue details.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks for a summary of the issue, but the student's answer is a complaint about the instructions.

"what is this issue about?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#371038)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#371038

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		Unfortunately, I do not have enough context to grade the student's answer. The question asks me to grade the student's response as either "CORRECT" or "INCORRECT" based on a provided context, but no specific question or context was provided. Without knowing what the actual question or relevant information is, I cannot assess if the student's response is accurate or not. Please provide the missing context so I can attempt to grade the response properly.
text-bison

"what is this issue about?"

(context: gitlab-org/gitlab#415547)

Resource

gitlab-org/gitlab#415547

Answer

I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!

LLM Evaluation

Tools used: []

Model	Grade	Details
claude-2.1		summarize {"id":129393876,"title":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","author_id":411701,"project_id":278964,"created_at":"2023-06-16T08:14:55.000Z","updated_at":"2024-04-01T16:48:26.350Z","description":"# Summary\n\n**Note:** This is part of &9290 (closed), where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\n\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via &7864.","milestone_id":2969687,"iid":415547,"updated_by_id":3860200,"weight":2,"confidential":false,"due_date":null,"moved_to_id":null,"lock_version":4,"title_html":"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue","description_html":"\u003ch1 data-sourcepos=\"1:1-1:9\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\n\u003ca id=\"user-content-summary\" class=\"anchor\" href=\"#summary\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003eSummary\u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:130\" dir=\"auto\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-sourcepos=\"3:1-3:9\"\u003eNote:\u003c/strong\u003e This is part of \u003ca href=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-reference-type=\"epic\" data-original=\"&9290 (closed)\" data-link=\"false\" data-link-reference=\"true\" data-group=\"9970\" data-group-path=\"gitlab-org\" data-iid=\"9290\" data-epic=\"657742\" data-container=\"body\" data-placement=\"top\" title=\"️ Work Items - Migrate Epics to Work Items\" class=\"gfm gfm-epic\"\u003e\u0026amp;9290\u003c/a\u003e, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp data-sourcepos=\"5:1-5:415\" dir=\"auto\"\u003eSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen \u003cem data-sourcepos=\"5:60-5:67\"\u003ebefore\u003c/em\u003e we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via \u003ca href=\"&7864\"\u003ehttps://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","time_estimate":0,"relative_position":-194466963,"service_desk_reply_to":null,"cached_markdown_version":2162688,"last_edited_at":"2023-06-16T08:22:38.000Z","last_edited_by_id":411701,"discussion_locked":null,"closed_at":"2023-09-11T14:58:26.000Z","closed_by_id":3860200,"state_id":2,"duplicated_to_id":null,"promoted_to_epic_id":null,"health_status":"on_track","external_key":null,"sprint_id":null,"blocking_issues_count":1,"upvotes_count":0,"work_item_type_id":1,"namespace_id":15846663,"start_date":null} The context provides details about adding support for setting a Work Item as the parent of an Issue in GitLab. This is part of a larger effort to migrate Epics to Work Items. The summary explains the need to associate legacy Issues with Epic Work Items until Issues are also migrated to Work Items. The student answer does not attempt to address the question or context. <function_calls> <tool_name>classify_student_answer</tool_name> <student_answer>I don't see how I can help. Please give better instructions!</student_answer> Details about adding support for setting a Work Item as the parent of an Issue in GitLab </function_calls> Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student answer does not attempt to address the question or provide any relevant information based on the context. It asks for better instructions without making an effort to understand or answer the question using the context provided. Therefore, the answer is incorrect.
text-bison		Grade: INCORRECT Explanation: The student's answer does not address the question. The question asks about the issue being discussed in the context, but the student's answer is a complaint about the lack of instructions.

mentioned in issue gitlab-org/modelops/ai-model-validation-and-research/ai-evaluation/ai-experiments#17 (closed)

added 1 commit

• 9602bc10 - Revert parsing

Compare with previous version

added 2 commits

• fc63dda6 - more green
• a160bf0e - more green

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 4567cd66 - more green

Compare with previous version

added 3 commits

• 6bfc0d20 - Green with refactors
• 423e2f67 - test for conversation history
• 46c13987 - Green test for conversation history

Compare with previous version

added 2 commits

• 54440f5a - Add comment about prompt length
• dc92c1c0 - change spec for new code

Compare with previous version

added groupduo chat label and removed groupai framework label

added 320 commits

• dc92c1c0...e9e72d21 - 319 commits from branch master
• e6af6a94 - Use Claude 3 Sonnet for Duo Chat Zero Shot

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 1f44c61d - Use Claude 3 Sonnet for Duo Chat Zero Shot

Compare with previous version