Advanced Search: Disable disk allocator
What does this MR do and why?
This MR sets cluster.routing.allocation.disk.threshold_enabled
to false for:
- Elasticsearch 7
- Elasticsearch 8
- Opensearch 1
- Opensearch 2
In CI to fix flaky specs #417198 (closed)
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
Before | After |
---|---|
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
assigned to @dgruzd
1 Warning Please add a merge request subtype to this merge request. 1 Message CHANGELOG missing: If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the
Changelog
trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the
EE: true
trailer to your commit message.If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.
Pipeline Changes
This merge request contains changes to the pipeline configuration for the GitLab project.
Please consider the effect of the changes in this merge request on the following:
- Effects on different pipeline types
- Effects on non-canonical projects:
gitlab-foss
security
dev
- personal forks
- Effects on pipeline performance
Please consider communicating these changes to the broader team following the communication guideline for pipeline changes
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer maintenanceworkflow / maintenancepipelines for CI, Danger Mo Khan (
@mokhax
) (UTC-6, 8 hours behind@dgruzd
)Rémy Coutable (
@rymai
) (UTC+2, same timezone as@dgruzd
)Engineering Productivity Reviewer review is optional for Engineering Productivity Alina Mihaila (
@alinamihaila
) (UTC+3, 1 hour ahead of@dgruzd
)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerEdited by Ghost Userchanged milestone to %16.3
- Resolved by Rémy Coutable
@joseph are you available for a maintenancepipelines review? Thanks!
@ddieulivol are you available for an Engineering Productivity maintainer review? Thank you!
requested review from @joseph and @ddieulivol
Allure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
test report for dd90c79dexpand test summary
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Manage | 13 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 | ❗ | | Govern | 21 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 21 | ❗ | | Plan | 51 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 51 | ❗ | | Create | 27 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 28 | ❗ | | Data Stores | 22 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 22 | ❗ | | Monitor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Verify | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | ❗ | | Package | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Framework sanity | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 146 | 0 | 4 | 69 | 150 | ❗ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
Edited by Ghost User@ddieulivol
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
added pipeline:mr-approved label
removed review request for @ddieulivol
removed review request for @joseph
requested review from @rymai
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 8995838a succeeds