Change data_consistency for epic cache counts

What does this MR do and why?

To avoid any data inconsistency, data_consistency: always is used.

Related to #378907 (comment 1179429951)

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

assigned to @jprovaznik

changed milestone to %15.7

added typemaintenance label

added backend label

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	Sashi Kumar Kumaresan (@sashi_kumar) (UTC+1, same timezone as @jprovaznik)	Luke Duncalfe (@.luke) (UTC+13, 12 hours ahead of @jprovaznik)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

added maintenancerefactor label

@nicolasdular could you please review?

requested review from @nicolasdular

Setting label groupproduct planning based on @jprovaznik's group.

added groupproduct planning label

Setting label(s) devopsplan sectiondev based on groupproduct planning.

added devopsplan sectiondev labels

approved this merge request

@nicolasdular, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

• rspec minimal jobs
• jest minimal jobs
• merging a merge request.

added 1 deleted label

requested review from @smcgivern

@reprazent because Sean is OOO today, could you please do maintainer review?

requested review from @reprazent and removed review request for @smcgivern