Remove old bg migration from rubocop todo files
What does this MR do and why?
The BG migration in question was removed in Removed in !92395 (merged)
Related issue : #342856 (closed)
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
added maintenanceworkflow typemaintenance labels
assigned to @tkuah
Suggested Reviewers (beta)
The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.
You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign
/assign_reviewer @user1
.Suggested Reviewers @jivanvl
,@rymai
,@a_akgun
,@dfrazao-gitlab
,@igor.drozdov
If you do not believe these suggestions are useful, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923
.Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot - an experimental ML-based recommendation engine created by ~"group::applied ml".
- A deleted user
added backend label
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend Tyler Amos ( @tyleramos
) (UTC-4, 16 hours behind@tkuah
)James Fargher ( @proglottis
) (UTC+12, same timezone as@tkuah
)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerEdited by Ghost Userchanged milestone to %15.4
@proglottis Can you please review this tiny MR ?
added grouptenant scale label
requested review from @proglottis
added devopsdata stores sectioncore platform labels
marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 7d1c87f2 succeeds
@proglottis
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
mentioned in commit 819c17e7
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label