Add top margin for auto fix card on vulnerability report

This MR adds a top margin for the auto fix card on the vulnerability report, so that it doesn't butt up either against the warning above it, or the dividing line above it:

With warning

Before	After

Without warning

Before	After

How to verify

The warning and cards are hidden forever once they're dismissed. The easiest way to get them to show again is to create a new user and set it as an auditor:

Then log in as the user and go to any vulnerability report. The warning and cards should show.

Related to #362201 (closed)

added Category:Vulnerability Management devopssecure frontend groupthreat insights sectionsec workflowin review labels

assigned to @dftian

mentioned in commit 472ab152

added 279 commits

• 1ae79493...9d0c6519 - 278 commits from branch master
• 472ab152 - Add top margin to auto fix card on vulnerability report

Compare with previous version

Suggested Reviewers (beta)

This is an experimental ML-based code reviewer recommendation system created by ~"group::applied ml".

The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.

After you review all recommendations, please assign reviewers manually, as this is not done automatically.

You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign /assign_reviewer @user1.

Reviewers
@kushalpandya, @iamphill, @jcaigitlab, @rymai, @rspeicher

If you do not believe these recommendations are useful or if you do not want to use any of the suggestions, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923.

Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot

changed title from Provide can_admin_vulnerability attribute to instance security dash to Add top margin for auto fix card on vulnerability report

changed the description

requested review from @pgascouvaillancourt

@pgascouvaillancourt Would you be able to do the review for this one?

added typebug label

	2 Warnings
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.
	This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Diana Zubova (@dzubova) (UTC+2, 12 hours ahead of @dftian)	Kushal Pandya (@kushalpandya) (UTC+5.5, 15.5 hours ahead of @dftian)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

Generated by Danger

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 69ae5207 and 925b1ecc

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	3.46 MB	3.46 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	1.93 MB	1.93 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Note: We do not have exact data for 69ae5207. So we have used data from: 682d4c3a.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

review-qa-blocking: test report for 925b1ecc

expand test summary

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                           |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
|                      | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | result |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Manage               | 31     | 0      | 2       | 29    | ❗     |
| Version sanity check | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
| Protect              | 2      | 0      | 0       | 2     | ❗     |
| Plan                 | 41     | 0      | 1       | 41    | ❗     |
| Create               | 24     | 0      | 2       | 22    | ❗     |
| Verify               | 12     | 0      | 1       | 12    | ❗     |
| Configure            | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
| Package              | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Total                | 110    | 0      | 9       | 106   | ❗     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+

approved this merge request

LGTM @dftian @mlunoe could you review this please?

requested review from @mlunoe and removed review request for @pgascouvaillancourt

@pgascouvaillancourt, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

• rspec minimal jobs
• jest minimal jobs
• merging a merge request.

mentioned in commit 47fe7fd0

added 284 commits

• 472ab152...c605916c - 283 commits from branch master
• 47fe7fd0 - Add top margin to auto fix card on vulnerability report

Compare with previous version

mentioned in commit 925b1ecc