Link by commit and name for pipeline
What does this MR do and why?
Links to pipeline by commit title rather than pipeline ID.
Screenshots or screen recordings
before | after |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
- Behind
rearrange_pipelines_table
enabled true - Visit pipelines table
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Related to #337496 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %14.8
assigned to @pburdette
1 Warning ⚠ featureaddition and featureenhancement merge requests normally have a documentation change. Consider adding a documentation update or confirming the documentation plan with the Technical Writer counterpart.
For more information, see:
- The Handbook page on merge request types.
- The definition of done documentation.
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend Artur Fedorov ( @arfedoro
) (UTC+3, 8 hours ahead of@pburdette
)Andrew Fontaine ( @afontaine
) (UTC-5, same timezone as@pburdette
)test Quality for spec/features/*
Aleksandr Lyubenkov ( @alyubenkov
) (UTC+3, 8 hours ahead of@pburdette
)Maintainer review is optional for test Quality for spec/features/*
To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
🚫 Dangermarked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed
- Resolved by Jose Ivan Vargas
@v_mishra can you review UX please?
requested review from @v_mishra
Allure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report for 8bf2a9fb!review-qa-smoke:
📝 test report
review-qa-reliable:📝 test reportmentioned in issue #27133 (closed)
👋 @v_mishra
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
added 248 commits
-
05dceec3...7db82023 - 247 commits from branch
master
- 458bd838 - Link by commit and name for pipeline
-
05dceec3...7db82023 - 247 commits from branch
removed review request for @v_mishra
Bundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 15637332 and 8bf2a9fb
✨ Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 3.68 MB 3.66 MB -21.64 KB -0.6 % mainChunk 2.29 MB 2.29 MB - -0.0 % 🎉 Significant Reduction: 12Expand
Entrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent pages.groups.usage_quotas 4.74 MB 1.04 MB -3.7 MB -78.1 % pages.groups.usage_quotas.pending_members 4.75 MB 1.05 MB -3.7 MB -77.9 % pages.admin.runners.show 986.94 KB 878.81 KB -108.13 KB -11.0 % pages.projects.cluster_agents.show 1.89 MB 1.81 MB -84.69 KB -4.4 % pages.projects.security.vulnerabilities.new 1.87 MB 1.82 MB -50.72 KB -2.6 % pages.groups.epics.new 1.45 MB 1.41 MB -44.84 KB -3.0 % pages.groups.wikis.edit 1.08 MB 1.04 MB -44.82 KB -4.0 % pages.projects.integrations.jira.issues.show 1.32 MB 1.27 MB -44.82 KB -3.3 % pages.projects.integrations.zentao.issues.show 1.31 MB 1.26 MB -44.82 KB -3.3 % pages.projects.releases.edit 1.32 MB 1.28 MB -44.82 KB -3.3 % The table above is limited to 10 entries. Please look at the full report for more details
Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
🚫 Dangerremoved workflowready for development label
- Resolved by Jose Ivan Vargas
@richard.chong can you review the small test changes here please?
requested review from @richard.chong
@jannik_lehmann can you review the FE changes here please?
If all looks good would you mind sending to
@jivanvl
for maintaining please?requested review from @jannik_lehmann
- Resolved by Jose Ivan Vargas
Good job @pburdette ! I was able to reproduce the behaviour, changes look good to. Just a small non-blocking nitpick for your consideration.
@jivanvl Could you take over for maintainer review?
requested review from @jivanvl and removed review request for @jannik_lehmann
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 0713f8b7 succeeds
mentioned in commit cf91279d
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowcanary label
mentioned in issue gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#12938 (closed)
mentioned in commit 7c2eca58
added releasedcandidate label
mentioned in issue #353387 (closed)
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!677 (merged)
mentioned in issue gl-retrospectives/verify-stage/pipeline-execution#24 (closed)
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label