Add source as argument to ResolvesPipelines
What does this MR do?
Add source
as argument to ResolvesPipelines
behind feature flag
This is part of the issue 338645
The name of the feature flag was suggested here
Screenshots or Screencasts (strongly suggested)
How to setup and validate locally (strongly suggested)
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
Conformity
-
I have included changelog trailers, or none are needed. (Does this MR need a changelog?) -
I have added/updated documentation, or it's not needed. (Is documentation required?) -
I have properly separated EE content from FOSS, or this MR is FOSS only. (Where should EE code go?) -
I have added information for database reviewers in the MR description, or it's not needed. (Does this MR have database related changes?) -
I have self-reviewed this MR per code review guidelines. -
This MR does not harm performance, or I have asked a reviewer to help assess the performance impact. (Merge request performance guidelines) -
I have followed the style guides. -
This change is backwards compatible across updates, or this does not apply.
Availability and Testing
-
I have added/updated tests following the Testing Guide, or it's not needed. (Consider all test levels. See the Test Planning Process.) -
I have tested this MR in all supported browsers, or it's not needed. -
I have informed the Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change per definition of done, or it's not needed.
Merge request reports
Activity
mentioned in issue #338645 (closed)
- A deleted user
added backend label
6 Warnings 0ebff512: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines. 61869224: The commit subject may not be longer than 72 characters. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines. c7fcf8fe: The commit subject must start with a capital letter. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines. e254d9c5: The commit subject must start with a capital letter. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines. bb14eaae: The commit subject may not be longer than 72 characters. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines. b3e9b17c: The commit subject must start with a capital letter. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines. 1 Message This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge. Documentation review
The following files require a review from a technical writer:
doc/api/graphql/reference/index.md
The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:
-
Metadata for the
*.md
files that you've changed. The first few lines of each*.md
file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change. - The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
- Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend Reuben Pereira ( @rpereira2
) (UTC+5.5)Heinrich Lee Yu ( @engwan
) (UTC+8)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Dangerassigned to @mc_rocha
- A deleted user
added grouppipeline execution label
- A deleted user
added feature flag label
mentioned in commit 7b508f78
marked the checklist item I have added information for database reviewers in the MR description, or it's not needed. (Does this MR have database related changes?) as completed
marked the checklist item I have properly separated EE content from FOSS, or this MR is FOSS only. (Where should EE code go?) as completed
marked the checklist item I have added/updated documentation, or it's not needed. (Is documentation required?) as completed
marked the checklist item I have included changelog trailers, or none are needed. (Does this MR need a changelog?) as completed
- A deleted user
added documentation label
added 2021Q1 gitlab.com Latency Degradation typemaintenance labels and removed documentation label
added typefeature label
removed 2021Q1 gitlab.com Latency Degradation label
added documentation label