Adjust UI text and placement on Learn GitLab
What does this MR do and why?
This changes the UI text and order to better organize conflicts and update terminology to avoid conflicting language.
- Adjusted the introductory sentence to be more concise
-
Create repository
was moved to position 0 in the first section. It is commonly completed during registration, so it makes more sense to be first in the list. - There are only ever 2 steps, so they were renamed to be more generic because they don't have to be done in sequence.
- Workspaces are now a feature in GitLab, so that term has been removed or replaced.
- Expanded the intent of planning and execute
- Adjusted Deploy to be about securing deployments
MR acceptance checklist
Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
Screenshots or screen recordings
Before | After |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
- Emulate SaaS mode in
gdk
- Register with a new user account
- Create a new project under a group namespace
- After creation you should have the
Learn GitLab XX%
in your navigation sidebar
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %17.2
added UI polish UI text UX frontend groupactivation labels
assigned to @aregnery
added pipelinetier-1 label
added devopsgrowth sectiongrowth labels
1 Warning This MR changes code in ee/
, but its Changelog commit is missing theEE: true
trailer. Consider adding it to your Changelog commits.Reviewer roulette
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend @snachnolkar
(UTC+5.5, 9.5 hours ahead of author)
@leipert
(UTC+2, 6 hours ahead of author)
Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerEdited by Ghost User- Resolved by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
Proper labels assigned to this merge request. Please ignore me.
@aregnery
- please see the following guidance and update this merge request.1 Error Please add typebug typefeature, or typemaintenance label to this merge request. Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
removed devopsgrowth pipelinetier-1 sectiongrowth labels
added devopsgrowth sectiongrowth labels
added typemaintenance label
- Resolved by Austin Regnery
@p_cordero I'd appreciate your thoughts on this change I put together. Mostly word smithing the page.
Bundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits ad929b5d and 0224162b
Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 4.29 MB 4.29 MB +2.66 KB 0.1 % mainChunk 3.25 MB 3.25 MB - 0.0 % Significant Growth: 3Expand
Entrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent pages.groups.epics.index 2.06 MB 2.47 MB +420 KB 19.9 % pages.groups.work_items 1.88 MB 2.28 MB +415.05 KB 21.6 % pages.groups.work_items.show 1.89 MB 2.3 MB +415.05 KB 21.4 %
Your MR has at least one entrypoint growing significantly (more > 1 KB or 2%). If you write new or extend existing features, this is expected and there is nothing to worry about.
Please consider pinging someone from the FE Foundations (
@leipert
,@markrian
,@pgascouvaillancourt
,@sdejonge
or@thutterer
) for review, if you are unsure about the size increase.Note: We do not have exact data for ad929b5d. So we have used data from: d0d94dbe.
The target commit was too new, so we used the latest commit from master we have info on.
It might help to rerun thebundle-size-review
job
This might mean that you have a few false positives in this report. If something unrelated to your code changes is reported, you can check this comparison in order to see if they caused this change.Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
DangerEdited by Ghost Userrequested review from @fneill
added maintenanceusability label
added Technical Writing label