Render environments as labels in Secrets table

What does this MR do and why?

Follow-up from !154536 (merged).

Because we changed the mock data in !154536 (merged), scoped labels (which are the same as environments, making this data redundant) are no longer shown. This MR fixes that so we render environments as scoped labels in the Secrets table.

Note that there's no backend integration for the Secrets Manager yet, so we're just working with mock data for now.

MR acceptance checklist

Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Before	After

How to set up and validate locally

1. Enable the ci_tanukey_ui feature flag for your project.

   Feature.enable(:ci_tanukey_ui, <project>)

2. Visit <path-to-project>/-/secrets.

assigned to @mgandres

changed milestone to %17.1

added pipelinetier-1 label

added frontend sectionci labels and removed pipelinetier-1 label

added pipelinetier-1 label

added 11 commits

• c68c4cfa...3b32adfc - 10 commits from branch master
• 74c1175a - Render environments as labels in Secrets table

Compare with previous version

added devopsverify grouppipeline security typemaintenance labels

added feature flagexists label

mentioned in merge request !154536 (merged)

	1 Message
	CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	@eduardobonet (UTC+2, 6 hours behind author)	@iamphill (UTC+1, 7 hours behind author)
~"Verify"	Reviewer review is optional for ~"Verify"	@mfluharty (UTC-6, 14 hours behind author)

Please check reviewer's status!

• Reviewer is available!
• Reviewer is unavailable!

Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

mentioned in issue #424460 (closed)

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits fca17173 and 5377e7b2

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.36 MB	4.36 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	3.32 MB	3.32 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Note: We do not have exact data for fca17173. So we have used data from: 85c5faa4.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

marked this merge request as ready

added 2461 commits

• 74c1175a...5e26f833 - 2460 commits from branch master
• 29b2bf33 - Render environments as labels in Secrets table

Compare with previous version

changed milestone to %17.2

added 1 commit

• 806b1969 - Render environments as labels in Secrets table

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 5377e7b2 - Render environments as labels in Secrets table

Compare with previous version

Hey @thomasrandolph, are you free to give this small MR a review?

requested review from @thomasrandolph

changed the description