Fix the merge icon in the reviewers dropdown being incorrect sometimes

What does this MR do and why?

Fix the merge icon in the reviewers dropdown being incorrect sometimes

If you select a user that does not appear in the initial user.json request and they have permission to merge and then you select that user we will incorrectly show the cannot merge icon next to their user in the dropdown. This is caused by getting data-can-merge from the hidden input instead of data-can_merge

MR acceptance checklist

Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Screenshots or screen recordings

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

changed milestone to %16.11

added bugtransient devopscreate frontend groupcode review typebug labels

assigned to @iamphill

added sectiondev label

	3 Warnings
	6c5292e4: The commit body should not contain more than 72 characters per line. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	This merge request changed files with disabled eslint rules. Please consider fixing them.
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.

	1 Message
	CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Disabled eslint rules

The following files have disabled eslint rules. Please consider fixing them:

• app/assets/javascripts/users_select/index.js

Run the following command for more details

node_modules/.bin/eslint --report-unused-disable-directives --no-inline-config \
  'app/assets/javascripts/users_select/index.js'

Reviewer roulette

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	@viktomas (UTC+2, 1 hour ahead of author)	@rchanila (UTC+10, 9 hours ahead of author)

Please check reviewer's status!

• Reviewer is available!
• Reviewer is unavailable!

Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits af9e4fed and 6c5292e4

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.32 MB	4.32 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	3.31 MB	3.31 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Note: We do not have exact data for af9e4fed. So we have used data from: cf6cb480.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

requested review from @kushalpandya

resolved all threads

approved this merge request

added pipeline:mr-approved label

@kushalpandya, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request has been approved. To ensure we don't only run predictive pipelines, and we don't break master, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

Please wait for the pipeline to start before resolving this discussion and set auto-merge for the new pipeline. See merging a merge request for more details.

E2E Test Result Summary

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for 6c5292e4

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create      | 90     | 0      | 9       | 0     | 99    | ✅     |
| Plan        | 51     | 0      | 2       | 0     | 53    | ✅     |
| Govern      | 66     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 66    | ✅     |
| Data Stores | 31     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 31    | ✅     |
| Verify      | 35     | 0      | 1       | 0     | 36    | ✅     |
| Package     | 24     | 0      | 6       | 0     | 30    | ✅     |
| Release     | 5      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 5     | ✅     |
| Analytics   | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Manage      | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Monitor     | 7      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 7     | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 311    | 0      | 19      | 0     | 330   | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-package-and-test: test report for 6c5292e4

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create      | 500    | 1      | 60      | 8     | 561   | ❌     |
| Package     | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Monitor     | 8      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Data Stores | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Govern      | 6      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 6     | ✅     |
| Plan        | 8      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 526    | 1      | 62      | 8     | 589   | ❌     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

resolved all threads

enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 92481389 succeeds

merged

mentioned in commit 22e1d4a0

added workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label