Activity feed: Make content better searchable
What does this MR do and why?
Activity feed: Make content better searchable
Adds the ability to do a full text search in event titles.
Before the different elements would break the search term to
make it impossible to search for e.g. commented on issue #
MR acceptance checklist
Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
Screenshots or screen recordings
Before | After |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
- Go to an activity feed
- Project: http://gdk.test:3000/flightjs/Flight/activity
- Profile: http://gdk.test:3000/root
- Search for:
commented on issue #
Related to Activity feed - not space used to separate Open... (#27154 - closed), ✂️ UX Paper Cuts 16.10 → Groups & Projects (#424397 - closed)
Closes #27154 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %16.10
assigned to @seggenberger
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
Hey
@ameliabauerly can you do the UX review?
@peterhegman can you do the frontend review?
cc @lohrc
TY
requested review from @ameliabauerly and @peterhegman
- A deleted user
added backend label
1 Warning 7b9222e9: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines. Reviewer roulette
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend @morefice
(UTC+1, same timezone as author)
@tianwenchen
(UTC+11, 10 hours ahead of author)
frontend @mcavoj
(UTC+1, same timezone as author)
@iamphill
(UTC+0, 1 hour behind author)
UX @mfangman
(UTC-6, 7 hours behind author)
Maintainer review is optional for UX Please check reviewer's status!
Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Dangerrequested review from @mnichols1
removed review request for @ameliabauerly
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
@mnichols1
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request has been approved. To ensure we don't only run predictive pipelines, and we don't break
master
, a new pipeline will be started shortly.Please wait for the pipeline to start before resolving this discussion and set auto-merge for the new pipeline. See merging a merge request for more details.
added pipeline:mr-approved label
removed review request for @mnichols1
E2E Test Result Summary
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
test report for 4682e47bexpand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Create | 66 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 75 | ✅ | | Plan | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | ✅ | | Package | 24 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 26 | ✅ | | Verify | 35 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 36 | ✅ | | Govern | 66 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 66 | ✅ | | Release | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ✅ | | Monitor | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | ✅ | | Analytics | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Manage | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 289 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 302 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
requested review from @viktomas and removed review request for @peterhegman
requested review from @deepika.guliani and removed review request for @viktomas
Bundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits e4ad88f5 and 4682e47b
Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 4.21 MB 4.21 MB - 0.0 % mainChunk 3.21 MB 3.21 MB - 0.0 %
Note: We do not have exact data for e4ad88f5. So we have used data from: d8e0d977.
The target commit was too new, so we used the latest commit from master we have info on.
It might help to rerun thebundle-size-review
job
This might mean that you have a few false positives in this report. If something unrelated to your code changes is reported, you can check this comparison in order to see if they caused this change.Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
Dangeradded 1 commit
- f0a38a08 - Use native capitalize feature instead of relying on CSS
added 1 commit
- 4682e47b - Use native capitalize feature instead of relying on CSS
requested review from @suraj_tripathy
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for c322577f succeeds
mentioned in commit ba5db685
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
added releasedcandidate label
mentioned in issue #27154 (closed)
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!2869 (merged)
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label
added devopsdata stores label
added pipelinetier-3 label
added devopsmanage label and removed devopsdata stores label