Re-add details about migrating artifacts back to local storage

What does this MR do and why?

The section migrate artifacts to local currently does not contain the command needed to migrate data. Seems it was removed in the commit 02629737, but it's not clear why because this command still exists.

This MR brings the instruction for migrating artifacts to local storage back to the docs.

MR acceptance checklist

Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

Before	After

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

changed milestone to %16.10

added Object Storage Support Team Contributions documentation labels

assigned to @atanayno

added maintenancerefactor + 1 deleted label

added typemaintenance label and removed 1 deleted label

requested review from @sselhorn

	1 Message
	This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge.

Documentation review

The following files require a review from a technical writer:

• doc/administration/job_artifacts.md (Link to current live version)

The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:

• Metadata for the *.md files that you've changed. The first few lines of each *.md file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change.
• The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
• Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

Hi @sselhorn, could you please check this MR? cc @axil as you participated in the old MR so probably you have some information why the rake task was removed from the docs.

@atanayno oops! Seems I accidentally removed it. I see I commented about that change here !108360 (comment 1231123188).

thanks for clarifying @axil!

added docs-only label

added 1 commit

• e9a5e72f - Fix docslint error

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

added 1 commit

• 753d2a45 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

added Technical Writing docsimprovement labels

added devopsverify grouppipeline security labels

added sectionci label

merged

Thanks @atanayno Good catch. Merging now.

mentioned in commit 9f199bc1

added workflowstaging-canary label