[BE] Provide script to run on console for bulk assignment

Purpose of this MR

• The current MR presents the Code Suggestions Bulk User Assignment rake task.
• The script accepts a CSV file path as a parameter and handles user assignments.
• This task is specifically designated for manual use and not automated or running within the GitLab codebase.

Local Setup and Validation Instructions

For details on setting up and validating the script locally, kindly document the file in the MR.

Related to #431619

changed milestone to %16.9

added Category:Seat Cost Management backend devopsfulfillment featureenhancement grouppurchase [DEPRECATED] sectionfulfillment typefeature workflowin dev + 1 deleted label

assigned to @mhamda

marked this merge request as draft

	7 Warnings
	7b19bc10: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	0103a6ef: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	ed755a24: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	ed755a24: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	cdf6bf56: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	4c36e394: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	f70090f5: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.

	1 Message
	This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge.

Documentation review

The following files require a review from a technical writer:

• doc/raketasks/user_management.md (Link to current live version)

The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:

• Metadata for the *.md files that you've changed. The first few lines of each *.md file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change.
• The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
• Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	@joseph (UTC+0, 1 hour behind author)	@engwan (UTC+8, 7 hours ahead of author)

Please check reviewer's status!

• Reviewer is available!
• Reviewer is unavailable!

Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

@bhrai, I suggest we review this script to determine the best course of action—whether to include it in the documentation or provide it upon request. Could you kindly review it?

requested review from @bhrai

added 2 commits

• 637d2411 - Move to use a rake task instead of a script
• e40448e4 - Add docs for usage

Compare with previous version

added documentation label

E2E Test Result Summary

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for d676f8ed

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create      | 8      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 11    | ✅     |
| Govern      | 3      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 3     | ✅     |
| Monitor     | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Plan        | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Package     | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Data Stores | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 21     | 0      | 4       | 0     | 25    | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

marked this merge request as ready

@bhrai Added specs and they are now green, do you mind having another look?

requested review from @bhrai