Remove unused `MAX_DAYS_OF_HISTORY` from vulnerabilities

changed milestone to %16.7

added devopsgovern groupthreat insights maintenanceremoval sectionsec typemaintenance workflowin dev + 1 deleted label

added 1 commit

d2844755 - Remove unused `MAX_DAYS_OF_HISTORY` from vulnerabilities

marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed

added backend label

	2 Warnings
⚠	d2844755: The commit body should not contain more than 72 characters per line. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
⚠	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.

	1 Message
📖	CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the `Changelog` trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	`@jnutt` (UTC+8, 1 hour ahead of author)	`@jarka` (UTC+1, 6 hours behind author)

Please check reviewer's status!

Reviewer is available!
Reviewer is unavailable!

Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the 🔁 danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

requested review from @jnutt

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: ✅ test report for d2844755

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create           | 52     | 0      | 9       | 0     | 61    | ✅     |
| Plan             | 55     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 55    | ✅     |
| Verify           | 31     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 31    | ✅     |
| Monitor          | 8      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Govern           | 57     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 57    | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 23     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 23    | ✅     |
| Package          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Manage           | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 226    | 0      | 12      | 0     | 238   | ✅     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-package-and-test: ❗ test report for d2844755

expand test summary

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|                       suites summary                        |
+--------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|        | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+--------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Govern | 289    | 0      | 23      | 3     | 312   | ❗     |
| Create | 131    | 0      | 12      | 0     | 143   | ✅     |
+--------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total  | 420    | 0      | 35      | 3     | 455   | ❗     |
+--------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

approved this merge request

requested review from @jarka and removed review request for @jnutt

👋 @jnutt, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request has been approved. To ensure we don't only run predictive pipelines, and we don't break master, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

Please wait for the pipeline to start before resolving this discussion and set auto-merge for the new pipeline. See merging a merge request for more details.