Group deps: Fix issue with long project names

What does this MR do and why?

Group deps: Fix issue with long project names

When a project name is too long, it wraps incorrectly within the filter option. This change fixes this.

Screenshots or screen recordings

	Before	After
unchecked
checked

How to set up and validate locally

1. Go to a group's dependency list (make sure that it contains at least one project with a long name)
2. Select the project filter
3. Verify that the filter options render correctly

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

Related to #433246 (closed)

changed milestone to %16.7

added Category:Dependency Management automation:ux-missing-labels bugux devopsgovern frontend groupthreat insights sectionsec typebug workflowin dev + 1 deleted label

assigned to @dpisek

	1 Warning
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.

	1 Message
	CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	@jmontal (UTC-7, 8 hours behind author)	@deepika.guliani (UTC+5.5, 4.5 hours ahead of author)

Please check reviewer's status!

• Reviewer is available!
• Reviewer is unavailable!

Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits dc2be3a0 and 61b91ab0

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.1 MB	4.1 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	3.04 MB	3.04 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Note: We do not have exact data for dc2be3a0. So we have used data from: d107f33c.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for 61b91ab0

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create           | 52     | 0      | 9       | 0     | 61    | ✅     |
| Plan             | 55     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 55    | ✅     |
| Manage           | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Verify           | 31     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 31    | ✅     |
| Govern           | 57     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 57    | ✅     |
| Monitor          | 8      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 23     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 23    | ✅     |
| Package          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 226    | 0      | 12      | 0     | 238   | ✅     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-package-and-test: test report for 61b91ab0

expand test summary

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|                       suites summary                        |
+--------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|        | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+--------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Govern | 288    | 0      | 23      | 3     | 311   | ❗     |
| Create | 131    | 0      | 12      | 0     | 143   | ✅     |
+--------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total  | 419    | 0      | 35      | 3     | 454   | ❗     |
+--------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-review-qa: test report for 61b91ab0

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create           | 6      | 0      | 4       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Govern           | 51     | 0      | 2       | 0     | 53    | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Monitor          | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Package          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Plan             | 3      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 66     | 0      | 9       | 0     | 75    | ✅     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

changed the description

@lorenzvanherwaarden - Could you please review?

requested review from @lorenzvanherwaarden

marked this merge request as ready

closed

reopened

approved this merge request

@lorenzvanherwaarden, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request has been approved. To ensure we don't only run predictive pipelines, and we don't break master, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

Please wait for the pipeline to start before resolving this discussion and set auto-merge for the new pipeline. See merging a merge request for more details.

added pipeline:mr-approved label

removed review request for @lorenzvanherwaarden

@svedova - Could you please maintainerize this small one?

requested review from @svedova

added 263 commits

• 251a1382...3a0cc41e - 262 commits from branch master
• 61b91ab0 - Group deps: Fix issue with long project names

Compare with previous version