Fix devops empty state illustration
What does this MR do and why?
Replace outdated HUGE illustration with new one
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
Before | After |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
- Go to
/admin/dev_ops_reports?tab=dev
- See the illustration
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %16.5
added UX Paper Cuts groupux paper cuts typemaintenance labels
assigned to @jmiocene
1 Warning You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests.
That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code,
but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.1 Message CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the
Changelog
trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend Javiera Tapia (
@jtapiab
) (UTC-3, 5 hours behind@jmiocene
)Smriti Garg (
@sgarg_gitlab
) (UTC+5.5, 3.5 hours ahead of@jmiocene
)frontend Deepika Guliani (
@deepika.guliani
) (UTC+5.5, 3.5 hours ahead of@jmiocene
)Ankit Panchal (
@ankit.panchal
) (UTC+5.5, 3.5 hours ahead of@jmiocene
)Please check reviewer's status!
Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerAllure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
test report for 06c607ebexpand test summary
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Create | 45 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 47 | ✅ | | Monitor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Plan | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 18 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 22 | ✅ | | Manage | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | ✅ | | Framework sanity | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Govern | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | ✅ | | Verify | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | ✅ | | Package | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 178 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 187 | ✅ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
- Resolved by Piotr Skorupa
Hey @hustewart @deepika.guliani
Could you please review backend and frontend?
requested review from @hustewart and @deepika.guliani
@hustewart
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request has been approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
added pipeline:mr-approved label
removed review request for @hustewart
requested review from @pskorupa
requested review from @ealcantara and removed review request for @deepika.guliani
mentioned in issue gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#34345 (closed)
mentioned in issue gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#34554 (closed)
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for a7249d5c succeeds
mentioned in commit 4850a26f
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label