Include double colon inside the translation

changed milestone to %16.4

added Threat InsightsNavy devopsgovern frontend groupthreat insights maintenancerefactor ready to pull sectionsec typemaintenance workflowin dev labels

assigned to @svedova

@lorenzvanherwaarden is this what you had in mind? Can you review this MR?

requested review from @lorenzvanherwaarden

	1 Warning
	This merge request contains lines with testid selectors. Please ensure `e2e:package-and-test` job is run.

Testid Selectors

The following changed lines in this MR contain testid selectors:

file ee/app/assets/javascripts/vulnerabilities/components/status_description.vue:

   <span :class="{ 'gl-font-weight-bold': isStatusBolded }" data-testid="status">

   <span :class="{ 'gl-font-weight-bold': isStatusBolded }" data-testid="status">{{

   <span :class="{ 'gl-font-weight-bold': isStatusBolded }" data-testid="dismissal-reason">

file ee/spec/frontend/vulnerabilities/status_description_spec.js:
- const statusEl = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="status"]');

If the e2e:package-and-test job in the qa stage has run automatically, please ensure the tests are passing. If the job has not run, please start the trigger-omnibus-and-follow-up-e2e job in the qa stage and ensure the tests in follow-up-e2e:package-and-test-ee pipeline are passing.

For the list of known failures please refer to the latest pipeline triage issue.

If your changes are under a feature flag, please check our Testing with feature flags documentation for instructions.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Sam Beckham (`@samdbeckham`) (UTC+1, 1 hour behind `@svedova`)	Paul Slaughter (`@pslaughter`) (UTC-5, 7 hours behind `@svedova`)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

mentioned in issue #413947 (closed)

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 806d8f03 and f469756d

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.17 MB	4.17 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	3.02 MB	3.02 MB	-	0.0 %

Note: We do not have exact data for 806d8f03. So we have used data from: 43100421.
The target commit was too new, so we used the latest commit from master we have info on.
It might help to rerun the bundle-size-review job
This might mean that you have a few false positives in this report. If something unrelated to your code changes is reported, you can check this comparison in order to see if they caused this change.

Please look at the full report for more details

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for f469756d

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Govern           | 36     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 36    | ✅     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Create           | 46     | 0      | 1       | 2     | 47    | ❗     |
| Monitor          | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Plan             | 51     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 51    | ✅     |
| Verify           | 8      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 22     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 22    | ✅     |
| Manage           | 13     | 0      | 1       | 1     | 14    | ❗     |
| Package          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 180    | 0      | 4       | 3     | 184   | ❗     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-review-qa: test report for f469756d

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Monitor          | 4      | 0      | 0       | 1     | 4     | ❗     |
| Govern           | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Create           | 8      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Plan             | 3      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Package          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Manage           | 1      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 1     | ✅     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 20     | 0      | 4       | 1     | 24    | ❗     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-package-and-test: test report for f469756d

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Verify           | 141    | 0      | 15      | 0     | 156   | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 117    | 0      | 3       | 0     | 120   | ✅     |
| Govern           | 167    | 0      | 3       | 6     | 170   | ❗     |
| Plan             | 246    | 0      | 10      | 0     | 256   | ✅     |
| Create           | 559    | 0      | 89      | 52    | 648   | ❗     |
| Systems          | 8      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Release          | 18     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 18    | ✅     |
| Package          | 226    | 0      | 17      | 0     | 243   | ✅     |
| Manage           | 158    | 0      | 13      | 25    | 171   | ❗     |
| GitLab Metrics   | 2      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 3     | ✅     |
| Analytics        | 7      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 7     | ✅     |
| Monitor          | 36     | 0      | 7       | 0     | 43    | ✅     |
| Fulfillment      | 8      | 0      | 72      | 0     | 80    | ✅     |
| Configure        | 1      | 0      | 9       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Secure           | 6      | 0      | 12      | 0     | 18    | ✅     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 5       | 0     | 5     | ➖     |
| Growth           | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | 6     | ➖     |
| ModelOps         | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | 6     | ➖     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 1700   | 0      | 268     | 83    | 1968  | ❗     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+