Fix positioning of MR sidebar at bottom of page
What does this MR do and why?
Fix positioning of MR sidebar at bottom of page
Screenshots or screen recordings
Before | After |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
- Enable
:moved_mr_sidebar
- Go to merge request
- Scroll all the way to bottom
- Right sidebar shouldn't scroll up (unless the viewport is small and/or there's a ton of sidebar content)
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %16.1
added UX UX Paper Cuts frontend maintenanceusability typemaintenance labels
assigned to @annabeldunstone
Please wait for Reviewer Roulette to suggest a designer for UX review, and then assign them as Reviewer. This helps evenly distribute reviews across UX.
This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.
- Resolved by David Pisek
1 Warning You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests.
That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code,
but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend Artur Fedorov (
@arfedoro
) (UTC+2, 2 hours ahead of@annabeldunstone
)Phil Hughes (
@iamphill
) (UTC+1, 1 hour ahead of@annabeldunstone
)UX Kevin Comoli (
@kcomoli
) (UTC+2, 2 hours ahead of@annabeldunstone
)Maintainer review is optional for UX To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Danger
requested review from @kcomoli
Bundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 575966ef and 71fc1fd3
Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 4.12 MB 4.12 MB - 0.0 % mainChunk 2.98 MB 2.98 MB - 0.0 %
Note: We do not have exact data for 575966ef. So we have used data from: 3d79baaa.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
DangerAllure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
test report for 71fc1fd3expand test summary
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Govern | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Create | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ❗ | | Framework sanity | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Manage | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ✅ | | Plan | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Monitor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 21 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 23 | ❗ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
e2e-review-qa:
test report for 71fc1fd3expand test summary
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Monitor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Create | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | ✅ | | Plan | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Govern | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Framework sanity | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Manage | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ❗ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 23 | ❗ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
requested review from @dpisek
@dpisek
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
added pipeline:mr-approved label
removed review request for @kcomoli
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 57c46db5 succeeds
mentioned in commit a11eea88
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
mentioned in merge request !122714 (merged)
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
added releasedcandidate label
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!2224 (merged)
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label