Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Document pass_user_identities_to_ci_jwt usage

What does this MR do and why?

Polish or add the documentation added for the objects that interact with the pass_user_identities_to_ci_jwt field. Add examples and links to useful examples or the issue that introduces the field.

See the relevant issue here: #387537 (closed)

Title Status
Add toggle for enabling user_identities to database/models !108477 (merged)
Add user_identities field to JwtV2 !117541 (merged)
Add API for changing the toggle !117874 (merged)
Document the new field :point_left: You are here

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • added backend label

  • @joe-snyder thanks. Content looks good overall, I've left a couple of small suggestions. Removing myself from the reviewer list for now, please re-add me when you want me to take another look. Back to you :ping_pong:

    Edited by Jon Glassman
  • Contributor
    1 Message
    :book: This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge.

    Documentation review

    The following files require a review from a technical writer:

    The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:

    Reviewer roulette

    Changes that require review have been detected!

    Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

    Category Reviewer Maintainer
    backend Max Fan current availability (@mfangitlab) (UTC-7) Michael Kozono current availability (@mkozono) (UTC-10)

    To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

    To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

    Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

    If needed, you can retry the :repeat: danger-review job that generated this comment.

    Generated by :no_entry_sign: Danger

  • Jon Glassman removed review request for @jglassman1

    removed review request for @jglassman1

  • Avielle Wolfe
  • Avielle Wolfe
  • Joe Snyder added 247 commits

    added 247 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Jon Glassman requested review from @jglassman1

    requested review from @jglassman1

  • Jon Glassman approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Furkan Ayhan resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Furkan Ayhan approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Furkan Ayhan removed review request for @avielle and @jglassman1

    removed review request for @avielle and @jglassman1

  • Joe Snyder added 205 commits

    added 205 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Furkan Ayhan removed review request for @furkanayhan

    removed review request for @furkanayhan

  • Hi @furkanayhan :wave:

    We noticed this MR is marked as workflowready for review but no reviewer is assigned. workflowin dev has automatically been applied to this MR based on the likelihood the review is finished. If additional reviews are still required, please assign a reviewer and reapply workflowready for review.

    @joe-snyder you may also request a review by commenting @gitlab-bot ready.

    This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

  • added workflowin dev label and removed workflowin review label

  • Joe Snyder added 886 commits

    added 886 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Joe Snyder added 326 commits

    added 326 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Joe Snyder added 1477 commits

    added 1477 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Joe Snyder added 1369 commits

    added 1369 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading