Add migration for backfilling traversal_ids in blobs and wiki blobs

What does this MR do and why?

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why.

Backfills the traversal_ids for blobs and wiki blobs in the main index, more details in the issue #351381 (closed)

Time for completion estimate calculation (internal link): 278 hours (may take a little longer due to having to work through each project). Indexing will not be paused during the migration.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

1. Run the following query to get the blobs and wiki_blobs with missing traversal_ids

{
  "size": 0,
  "query": {
    "bool": {
      "must_not": {
        "exists": {
          "field": "traversal_ids"
        }
      },
      "must": {
        "terms": {
          "type": [
            "blob",
            "wiki_blob"
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "aggs": {
    "my-agg-name": {
      "terms": {
        "size": 1000,
        "field": "project_id"
      }
    }
  }
}

2. Make sure advanced search is enabled and you run the migration from rails console by entering the following lines:

require File.expand_path('ee/elastic/migrate/20221221110300_add_traversal_ids_in_blobs_and_wiki_blobs.rb')
BackfillTraversalIdsToBlobsAndWikiBlobs.new(20221221110300).migrate

3. Run the query again in ES to verify that there are no records with misssing traversal_ids

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

Related to #351381 (closed)

changed milestone to %15.8

added Category:Global Search Deliverable Next1-3 releases [deprecated] Accepting merge requests advanced search auto updated bugperformance devopsdata stores groupglobal search sectioncore platform typemaintenance workflowin dev labels

assigned to @sdungarwal

added typebug label and removed typemaintenance label

changed the description

added backend label

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	Joseph Joshua (@joseph) (UTC+0, 1 hour behind @sdungarwal)	Max Woolf (@mwoolf) (UTC+0, 1 hour behind @sdungarwal)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the 🔁 danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

mentioned in issue #351381 (closed)

marked this merge request as draft

added 1 commit

• 09200e41 - Add specs and rename migration acc to class name

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 588b166e - Add specs and rename migration acc to class name

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• e08e3eb4 - Add specs and rename migration acc to class name

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

added 1 commit

• 94d23ae4 - Add update by query and fix specs

Compare with previous version

marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed

resolved all threads