fix: Bump ci_build_failed snowplow schema to latest

What does this MR do and why?

1-0-1 increase the max build_id to prevent numeric overflows

Depends on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/iglu/-/merge_requests/80

See #330551 (comment 1192762998)

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

changed milestone to %15.7

added Category:SAST bugfunctional devopssecure groupstatic analysis priority3 severity3 typebug labels

assigned to @theoretick

added sectionsec label

marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed

added backend label

	1 Warning
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.

	1 Message
	CHANGELOG missing: If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the EE: true trailer to your commit message. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	Eugenia Grieff (@egrieff) (UTC+1, 9 hours ahead of @theoretick)	Matthias Käppler (@mkaeppler) (UTC+1, 9 hours ahead of @theoretick)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

@rossfuhrman This depends on the corresponding iglu MR but would you please review this one?

requested review from @rossfuhrman

approved this merge request

@rossfuhrman, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

• rspec minimal jobs
• jest minimal jobs
• merging a merge request.

added pipeline:mr-approved label

requested review from @a_akgun and removed review request for @rossfuhrman

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 8714ceba succeeds

merged

mentioned in commit 24d02a5f

added workflowstaging-canary label