Fix Opensearch compatibility check
What does this MR do and why?
In this MR we are doing a couple of things:
- Match
SystemCheck::App::SearchCheck
with the stated Opensearch versions supported (1.x or later) - Switch
ee/spec/lib/system_check/app/search_check_spec.rb
to usingfast_spec_helper
, which drastically improve performance
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Related to #378958 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %Backlog
assigned to @dgruzd
changed milestone to %15.6
added Pick into 15.3 Pick into 15.4 Pick into 15.5 labels
- A deleted user
added backend label
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend Bojan Marjanović (
@bmarjanovic
) (UTC+2, same timezone as@dgruzd
)Mikołaj Wawrzyniak (
@mikolaj_wawrzyniak
) (UTC+2, same timezone as@dgruzd
)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerEdited by Ghost User- Resolved by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
Proper labels assigned to this merge request. Please ignore me.
@dgruzd - please see the following guidance and update this merge request.1 Warning Please add a subtype label to this merge request. If you have added a type label and do not feel the purpose of this merge request matches one of the subtypes labels, please resolve this discussion.
Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed
added bugfunctional label
requested review from @maddievn
mentioned in issue #378958 (closed)
@maddievn
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links: