Fix Opensearch compatibility check
What does this MR do and why?
In this MR we are doing a couple of things:
- Match
SystemCheck::App::SearchCheck
with the stated Opensearch versions supported (1.x or later) - Switch
ee/spec/lib/system_check/app/search_check_spec.rb
to usingfast_spec_helper
, which drastically improve performance
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Related to #378958 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %Backlog
assigned to @dgruzd
changed milestone to %15.6
added Pick into 15.3 Pick into 15.4 Pick into 15.5 labels
- A deleted user
added backend label
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend Bojan Marjanović (
@bmarjanovic
) (UTC+2, same timezone as@dgruzd
)Mikołaj Wawrzyniak (
@mikolaj_wawrzyniak
) (UTC+2, same timezone as@dgruzd
)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Danger- Resolved by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
Proper labels assigned to this merge request. Please ignore me.
@dgruzd - please see the following guidance and update this merge request.1 Warning Please add a subtype label to this merge request. If you have added a type label and do not feel the purpose of this merge request matches one of the subtypes labels, please resolve this discussion.
Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed
added bugfunctional label
requested review from @maddievn
mentioned in issue #378958 (closed)
@maddievn
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
- Resolved by Terri Chu
added Deliverable workflowin review labels
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 64d9e040 succeeds
mentioned in commit 0bb832e4
added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowin review label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
mentioned in merge request !89215 (merged)
picked the changes into the branch
15-5-stable-ee-patch-3
with commit c7094017Automatically picked into !103157 (merged), will merge into
15-5-stable-ee
ready for15.5.3-ee
.mentioned in commit c7094017
removed Pick into 15.5 label
mentioned in merge request !103157 (merged)
added releasedcandidate label
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!1646 (merged)
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label