Create "test reports" widget for requirements work item type
Designs
- Show closed items
Relates to
Activity
-
Newest first Oldest first
-
Show all activity Show comments only Show history only
- Matthew Macfarlane added Category:Requirements Management [deprecated] Accepting merge requests backend devopsplan sectiondev + 1 deleted label
added Category:Requirements Management [deprecated] Accepting merge requests backend devopsplan sectiondev + 1 deleted label
- Matthew Macfarlane changed title from Create "test reports" widget for requirements work item type (BE Specific to Create "test reports" widget for requirements work item type
changed title from Create "test reports" widget for requirements work item type (BE Specific to Create "test reports" widget for requirements work item type
- Matthew Macfarlane changed the description
Compare with previous version changed the description
- Matthew Macfarlane mentioned in issue #336892
mentioned in issue #336892
- Matthew Macfarlane changed milestone to %Backlog
changed milestone to %Backlog
- Matthew Macfarlane added to epic &5171
added to epic &5171
- charlie ablett mentioned in epic &9203
mentioned in epic &9203
- Matthew Macfarlane mentioned in issue gitlab-com/Product#5295 (closed)
mentioned in issue gitlab-com/Product#5295 (closed)
- Developer
I think this is weight 4, though it might be easier than that. I think there has been previous work in !100045 (merged) so it may be a 3 (I think once development starts it will be more clear).
cc @felipe_artur - feel free to adjust.
1 - charlie ablett set weight to 4
set weight to 4
- Jarka Košanová changed milestone to %15.9
changed milestone to %15.9
- Maintainer
@jarka, thanks for adding the workflowready for development label.
This issue has been sent back to workflowrefinement because it's missing the work type classification.
Please add a
type::
label and try again.This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.
- 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖 added workflowrefinement label and removed workflowready for development label
added workflowrefinement label and removed workflowready for development label
- Jarka Košanová added workflowready for development label and removed workflowrefinement label
added workflowready for development label and removed workflowrefinement label
- Maintainer
@jarka, thanks for adding the workflowready for development label.
This issue has been sent back to workflowrefinement because it's missing the work type classification.
Please add a
type::
label and try again.This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.
- 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖 added workflowrefinement label and removed workflowready for development label
added workflowrefinement label and removed workflowready for development label
- Jarka Košanová added featureaddition workflowready for development labels and removed workflowrefinement label
added featureaddition workflowready for development labels and removed workflowrefinement label
- 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖 added typefeature label
added typefeature label
- Maintainer
@jarka, thanks for adding the workflowready for development label.
This issue has been sent back to workflowrefinement because it's missing the work type classification.
Please add a
type::
label and try again.This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.
- 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖 added workflowrefinement label and removed workflowready for development label
added workflowrefinement label and removed workflowready for development label
- Jarka Košanová added workflowready for development label and removed workflowrefinement label
added workflowready for development label and removed workflowrefinement label
- Maintainer
Setting health status to
on track
as the milestone has just begun. - 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖 changed health status to on track
changed health status to on track
- Felipe Cardozo assigned to @felipe_artur
assigned to @felipe_artur
- Felipe Cardozo added workflowin dev label and removed workflowready for development label
added workflowin dev label and removed workflowready for development label
- Felipe Cardozo added workflowin review label and removed workflowin dev label
added workflowin review label and removed workflowin dev label
- Felipe Cardozo mentioned in merge request !109359 (merged)
mentioned in merge request !109359 (merged)
- Matthew Macfarlane mentioned in epic &4668
mentioned in epic &4668
- Felipe Cardozo added workflowverification label and removed workflowin review label
added workflowverification label and removed workflowin review label
- Felipe Cardozo marked this issue as related to #389585 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #389585 (closed)
- Maintainer
Verified in production https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/870ef9b6b10
Did run the query below in prod:
query requirements { project(fullPath: "issue-reproduce/requirements") { workItems(types: [REQUIREMENT]) { nodes { title widgets { ... on WorkItemWidgetTestReports { testReports { edges { node { id state usesLegacyIid } } } } } } } } }
Edited by Felipe Cardozo Collapse replies - Maintainer
I did open #389585 (closed) to discuss if we need additional properties on this widget.
@cablett Do you think we need anything else on this one? Otherwise, I think we can close it.
cc @jprovaznik
Edited by Felipe Cardozo - Developer
I thought something like
job
orauthor
(for information about circumstances of the test report generation) might be helpful? I'll comment in the issue - Developer
I think for the first iteration of this, it can close. Great work @felipe_artur
1 - Author Developer
Great work, @felipe_artur !
1
- Felipe Cardozo closed
closed
- Ghost User mentioned in issue gl-retrospectives/plan#87 (closed)
mentioned in issue gl-retrospectives/plan#87 (closed)