Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Add note about empty runner-registration-token

Merged Vladimir Shushlin requested to merge vshushlin/emply-runner-registration-token into main
All threads resolved!

What does this MR do?

We have multiple users trying to solve a problem when their secret storage solution doesn't allow them to set empty string as a value for secret.

This isn't actually a problem, they just need to use new token architecture(we've already updated docs to it), and they can set anything for runner-registration-token, runner-token will take precedence anyway.

This MR clarifies the docs

What are the relevant issue numbers?

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Romuald Atchadé approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • added 1 commit

    • ad6e90ac - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

    Compare with previous version

  • 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖 changed milestone to %16.4

    changed milestone to %16.4

  • Fiona Neill resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Fiona Neill approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Hi @fneill :wave:,

    GitLab Bot has added the Technical Writing label because a Technical Writer has approved or merged this MR.

    This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

  • Fiona Neill enabled automatic add to merge train when the pipeline for 7930bdae succeeds

    enabled automatic add to merge train when the pipeline for 7930bdae succeeds

  • Fiona Neill started a merge train

    started a merge train

  • merged

  • Fiona Neill mentioned in commit 0b0b0364

    mentioned in commit 0b0b0364

  • Romuald Atchadé mentioned in merge request !5054 (merged)

    mentioned in merge request !5054 (merged)

  • Amy Qualls mentioned in issue #38236

    mentioned in issue #38236

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading