Skip to content

Infrastructure retrospective documentation

Amy Shiel requested to merge infra-team-retro-docs into main

Why is this change being made?

During the week @o-lluch provided this guidance, on how to close a retro, to an onboarding EM. This is excellent advice and I could not find it documented in the handbook. I am not positive that this is the right place for it but trust @marin can advise.

Having retrospective documentation in the handbook ensures we are following best practises and getting the most out of our retros.

Author and Reviewer Checklist

Please verify the check list and ensure to tick them off before the MR is merged.

  • Provided a concise title for this Merge Request (MR)
  • Added a description to this MR explaining the reasons for the proposed change, per say why, not just what
    • Copy/paste the Slack conversation to document it for later, or upload screenshots. Verify that no confidential data is added, and the content is SAFE
  • Assign reviewers for this MR to the correct Directly Responsible Individual/s (DRI)
    • If the DRI for the page/s being updated isn’t immediately clear, then assign it to one of the people listed in the Maintained by section on the page being edited
    • If your manager does not have merge rights, please ask someone to merge it AFTER it has been approved by your manager in #mr-buddies
    • The when to get approval handbook section explains the workflow in more detail
  • For transparency, share this MR with the audience that will be impacted.
    • Team: For changes that affect your direct team, share in your group Slack channel
    • Department: If the update affects your department, share the MR in your department Slack channel
    • Division: If the update affects your division, share the MR in your division Slack channel
    • Company: If the update affects all (or the majority of) GitLab team members, post an update in #whats-happening-at-gitlab linking to this MR

Commits

  • added infra retro documentation

Merge request reports