Remove virtual local cache entries

Why is this change being made?

Local upstreams for virtual repositories are out of scope for the MVP,
so drop the *_virtual_local_cache_entries tables and related "local or remote" upstream wording from the schema doc to keep it focused on the
first iteration.

Addressed !19225 (comment 3249312903)

Author and Reviewer Checklist

Please verify the check list and ensure to tick them off before the MR is merged.

  • Provided a concise title for this Merge Request (MR)
  • Added a description to this MR explaining the reasons for the proposed change, per say why, not just what
    • Copy/paste the Slack conversation to document it for later, or upload screenshots. Verify that no confidential data is added, and the content is SAFE
  • Assign reviewers for this MR to the correct
    • The when to get approval handbook section explains when DRI approval is required
    • The who can approve handbook section explains how to identify the DRI
    • If the MR does not require DRI approval, consider asking someone on your team, such as your manager.
    • The approver may merge the MR. If they approve but don't merge, you can merge.
  • For transparency, share this MR with the audience that will be impacted.
    • Team: For changes that affect your direct team, share in your group Slack channel
    • Department: If the update affects your department, share the MR in your department Slack channel
    • Division: If the update affects your division, share the MR in your division Slack channel
    • Company: If the update affects all (or the majority of) GitLab team members, post an update in #whats-happening-at-gitlab linking to this MR

Commits

  • Remove virtual local cache entries

Local upstreams for virtual repositories are out of scope for the MVP, so drop the *_virtual_local_cache_entries tables and related "local or remote" upstream wording from the schema doc to keep it focused on the first iteration.


Edited by Dzmitry (Dima) Meshcharakou

Merge request reports

Loading