... | ... | @@ -9,14 +9,13 @@ The PDC has a long history of making data freely available online. Making that i |
|
|
|
|
|
## Goals
|
|
|
1. The public has a mechanism for easily determining what data assets are available and how to access them.
|
|
|
1. All data assets are documented sufficiently so the a member of the general public and understand what the data elements are and how they link back to the individual source records where applicable as well as the temporal range of the data and frequency of updates.
|
|
|
1. All data assets are documented sufficiently so that a member of the general public can understand what the data elements are and how they link back to the individual source records where applicable. All metadata describe the temporal range of the data and frequency of updates.
|
|
|
1. The public has a mechanism for providing ongoing feedback regarding data access and availability.
|
|
|
1. The public has open access to agency plans prioritization and progress regarding data access and availability.
|
|
|
1. The public is actively solicited for involvement in any major projects that would increase, decrease or modify the availability of public data.
|
|
|
1. The PDC regularly evaluating minor corrections and enhancements that can be made to open data systems as a part of related maintenance work.
|
|
|
1. The public has open access to agency plans, prioritization and progress regarding data access and availability.
|
|
|
1. The public is actively solicited for involvement in any major projects that would increase, decrease, or modify the availability of public data.
|
|
|
1. The PDC is regularly evaluating public feedback for the purpose of prioritizing major work to evolve and improve data access.
|
|
|
1. Open data priorities established through this open public engagement are evaluated as part of all major projects, including business processes and other changes that are not technical but might impact data access and availability.
|
|
|
1. Minor work, feature enhancements and corrections will be considered for ongoing maintenance work rather than requiring a major project.
|
|
|
1. Minor work, feature enhancements, and corrections will be considered for ongoing maintenance work rather than requiring a major project.
|
|
|
1. The PDC is continuously evolving its methodology and ideology regarding Open Data in a way that responds to changing public needs and expectations.
|
|
|
1. The PDC is compliant with Washington State OCIO policy 187 regarding Open Data planning.
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -34,9 +33,10 @@ The PDC maintains a public facing issue queue to document requests for enhanceme |
|
|
|
|
|
The public and PDC staff may review, comment and open requests for new data sets, corrections or feature enhancements directly through the issue queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The public facing issue will be regularly updated to reflect the current state of related projects and prioritization activities.
|
|
|
The public facing issue queue will be regularly updated to reflect the current state of related projects and prioritization activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Agency Executive Management team has responsibility for prioritization and regular evaluation of the Open Data Program. The team will evaluate the program at least annually and publicly document the review, findings, and outcomes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDC staff will regularly evaluate the issue queue and determine which issues or requests are candidates for regular maintenance work or bug fixes that can be applied in conjunction with other planned work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## [How to get involved] (https://gitlab.com/wapdc/OpenData-Program/wikis/how-to-get-involved). |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |