Skip to content
GitLab
    • GitLab: the DevOps platform
    • Explore GitLab
    • Install GitLab
    • How GitLab compares
    • Get started
    • GitLab docs
    • GitLab Learn
  • Pricing
  • Talk to an expert
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
    • Switch to GitLab Next
    Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • tezos tezos
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
    • Locked files
  • Issues 1,913
    • Issues 1,913
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
    • Requirements
  • Merge requests 262
    • Merge requests 262
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test cases
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Code review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • TezosTezos
  • tezostezos
  • Repository
  • tezos
  • docs
  • whitedoc
  • gas_consumption.rst
Find file BlameHistoryPermalink
  • Raphaël Cauderlier's avatar
    !fixup: better integration of the interpretation cost table · d27175a9
    Raphaël Cauderlier authored Sep 17, 2020
    This removes some duplication in the explanations of the
    interpretation costs and some pieces of information that are not
    useful in a documentation like the name of the cost functions.
    d27175a9