Compare our potential approaches to the development of tools such as stencila
eLife seems to be the journal that has taking the most initiative around this area. They have several posts on reproducible scientific articles and a few people that are working on developing editors that are compatible with Jupyter and R notebooks. They are working on DAR which is scientific articles are repositories and Stencila/Texture which is an editor, and trying to introduce live editable reproducible articles such as https://elifesciences.org/labs/ad58f08d. A few resources
- https://elifesciences.org/labs/7dbeb390/reproducible-document-stack-supporting-the-next-generation-research-article
- https://substance.io/
- https://substance.io/repro-docs/
- https://elifesciences.org/labs/c496b8bb/stencila-an-office-suite-for-reproducible-research
- https://stenci.la/
Do we think of our workflow as alternative or compatible with something like this? Their standards, e.g. the DAR are open.