-
Daniel P. Berrangé authored
The general expectation is that header files should follow the same file/path naming scheme as the corresponding source file. There are various historical exceptions to this practice in QEMU, with one of the most notable being the include/qapi/qmp/ directory. Most of the headers there correspond to source files in qobject/. This patch corrects most of that inconsistency by creating include/qobject/ and moving the headers for qobject/ there. This also fixes MAINTAINERS for include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h: scripts/get_maintainer.pl now reports "QAPI" instead of "No maintainers found". Signed-off-by:
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> #s390x Signed-off-by:
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20241118151235.2665921-2-armbru@redhat.com> [Rebased]
Daniel P. Berrangé authoredThe general expectation is that header files should follow the same file/path naming scheme as the corresponding source file. There are various historical exceptions to this practice in QEMU, with one of the most notable being the include/qapi/qmp/ directory. Most of the headers there correspond to source files in qobject/. This patch corrects most of that inconsistency by creating include/qobject/ and moving the headers for qobject/ there. This also fixes MAINTAINERS for include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h: scripts/get_maintainer.pl now reports "QAPI" instead of "No maintainers found". Signed-off-by:
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> #s390x Signed-off-by:
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20241118151235.2665921-2-armbru@redhat.com> [Rebased]
Loading