Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • master default
  • oldlib
  • v4.0.5
  • v4.0.5rc1
  • v4.0.4
  • v4.0.4_rc1
  • v4.0.3
  • v4.0.3_rc1
  • v4.0.2
  • v4.0.2_rc1
  • v4.0.1
  • v4.0.1rc3
  • v4.0.1rc2
  • v4.0.1rc1
  • v4.0.0
  • v3.3.17
  • v3.3.17rc1
  • v3.3.16
  • v3.3.15
  • v3.3.14
  • v3.3.13
  • v3.3.13rc1
22 results

top.c

  • jim warner's avatar
    7279cd8e
    top: raise %CPU maximum if large numbers of processors · 7279cd8e
    jim warner authored and Craig Small's avatar Craig Small committed
    
    It would appear that openSUSE was the first to release
    procps-ng version 4.0.0 (in the tumbleweed distro). As
    a result I checked their source rpm and found a couple
    of patches I'm porting to newlib for the next release.
    
    This particulate patch, with some changes, is openSUSE
    patch 'procps-ng-3.3.10-large_pcpu.patch'. The changes
    were strictly cosmetic. They involved whitespace only.
    
    [ it should be noted that the net effect for raising ]
    [ the maximum is to produce a '?' in the %CPU field. ]
    [ that's because its width is fixed at five columns. ]
    [ but at least the '?' won't distort actual results. ]
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarJim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
    7279cd8e
    History
    top: raise %CPU maximum if large numbers of processors
    jim warner authored and Craig Small's avatar Craig Small committed
    
    It would appear that openSUSE was the first to release
    procps-ng version 4.0.0 (in the tumbleweed distro). As
    a result I checked their source rpm and found a couple
    of patches I'm porting to newlib for the next release.
    
    This particulate patch, with some changes, is openSUSE
    patch 'procps-ng-3.3.10-large_pcpu.patch'. The changes
    were strictly cosmetic. They involved whitespace only.
    
    [ it should be noted that the net effect for raising ]
    [ the maximum is to produce a '?' in the %CPU field. ]
    [ that's because its width is fixed at five columns. ]
    [ but at least the '?' won't distort actual results. ]
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarJim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
Code owners
Assign users and groups as approvers for specific file changes. Learn more.