Update engagement naming/branding conventions and organization
Goal
Rationalize branding and naming conventions between post engagement types. Currently, other than remind, there isn't much originality behind the branding of our engagement products. Plenty of room to organize and improve.
It's also worth noting that the organization of our engagement types isn't optimized. For instance, Twitter has a whole share button with many suboptions. Our share button and copy link is buried in the dropdown. Right now, we don't have a Boost option on other people's posts when we easily could.
What needs to be done
Currently we have:
- Your posts - Upvote, Downvote, Comment, Remind (Remind/Quote Post), Boost (Newsfeed/Offer)
- Other's posts - Upvote, Downvote, Comment, Remind (Remind/Quote Post), Tip
Proposal A:
- Your posts - Upvote, Downvote, Reply (Quote Post), Remind, Boost/Supermind
- Other's posts - Upvote, Downvote, Reply (Quote Post), Remind, Boost/Supermind, Tip
Proposal B:
- Your posts - Mind, Unmind/Nevermind, Remind, Reply (Quote Post), Supermind, Boost
- Other's posts - Mind, Unmind/Nevermind, Remind, Reply (Quote Post), Supermind, Boost, Tip
Other words of interest:
- Mindblow, SuperBoost, Paid Reply, Offer, MegaShout
QA
UX/Design
Personas
Experiments
Acceptance Criteria
-
...
Definition of Ready Checklist
-
Definition Of Done (DoD) -
Acceptance criteria -
Weighted -
QA -
UX/Design -
Personas -
Experiments
Edited by Bill Ottman