Give some love to Tez_repr
The following discussions from !356 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@yrg started a discussion: I find this piece of code particularly hard to read.
A more combinator-based approach could probably help here.
-
@yrg started a discussion: Similar remark here. This code can be simplified for sure!
-
@yrg started a discussion: This
*?
is far too complex to be left undocumented.