Implement Interfaces with PyUnicore

Summary

As a mantik user, I want to have a good interface so I can work with Mantik in a much easier and seamless way, so I don't have to waste tie to figure things out.

More Information

The interface for data transfer with mantik client and CLI was designed in #104 (closed).

Additional Notes / Information

In mantik-api#75 (closed) it is noted how PyUnicore can be used for remote data handling.

Suggested Implementation

• Use UNICORE credentials from env vars, handle them in the mantik client config
• Implement the mantik.remote_file_service.abstract_file_service.AbstractFileService interface with PyUnicore
• Add documentation on how to transfer, retrieve and use files with the file service implementation

Testing

E2E test against local system (see mantik-api/docker/docker-compose).

Acceptance Criteria

• Files can be copied to remote system
• Files can be downloaded from remote system
• File can be removed from remote system

added to epic &48 (closed)

added Spike needsrefinement labels

changed the description

changed the description

added teamgreen label

@thomas_ambrosys

removed Spike label

changed the description

moved from mantik-api#76 (moved)

changed the description

removed needsrefinement label

set weight to 2

added typestory label

removed teamgreen label

marked this issue as blocking #110 (closed)

assigned to @jakub.jagielski

mentioned in merge request !82 (merged)

added flowdevelop label

marked the checklist item Files can be copied to remote system as completed

marked the checklist item Files can be downloaded from remote system as completed

marked the checklist item File can be removed from remote system as completed

marked the checklist item Implement the mantik.remote_file_service.abstract_file_service.AbstractFileService interface with PyUnicore as completed

marked the checklist item Add documentation on how to transfer, retrieve and use files with the file service implementation as completed

closed with commit 074da4ce

closed with merge request !82 (merged)

mentioned in issue #121

mentioned in commit 074da4ce

changed the description