Skip to content
GitLab
    • GitLab: the DevOps platform
    • Explore GitLab
    • Install GitLab
    • How GitLab compares
    • Get started
    • GitLab docs
    • GitLab Learn
  • Pricing
  • Talk to an expert
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
    • Switch to GitLab Next
    Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • LIGO LIGO
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
    • Locked files
  • Issues 172
    • Issues 172
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
  • Merge requests 42
    • Merge requests 42
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test cases
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Code review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • ligolang
  • LIGOLIGO
  • Merge requests
  • !1511

Improve representaiton of polymorphism in Cameligo

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Pierre-Emmanuel Wulfman requested to merge improve_representaiton_of_polymorphism into dev Jan 25, 2022
  • Overview 37
  • Commits 19
  • Pipelines 31
  • Changes 85
  • has a changelog entry

This MR improve abstraction of let toto (type a) (x : a) : a = x buy introducing the big-lambda operator let toto = biglambda a -> lambda (x : a) -> (x : a) as a construct E_type_abstraction

This as the advantages of greatly simplifying all processing in the pipeline as all information to process the rhs of a let_in is now inside the rhs and scoped to the rhs

We decided with exequiel to get rid of _a in Cameligo. and move the detection of such variable in the abstractor for the other syntax. I didn't go further in the abstractor as we are introducing equivalent to (type a).

Edited Feb 08, 2022 by Pierre-Emmanuel Wulfman
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: improve_representaiton_of_polymorphism