Follow-up from "Change model of transmitter to include drift and type"
The following discussion from !307 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@acinonyx started a discussion: (+1 comment) I think it may be better to store the frequency drift in PPM instead of frequency in the database. The user can still input the drift (or better the actual observed frequency) in Hz and we can calculate the PPMs in JS with the
Hz * 10^6 / f
formula.