Skip to content

Draft: avoid np.seterr() in fxc

Ask Hjorth Larsen requested to merge no-more-seterr into master

We add 1e-16 to avoid dividing by zero -- instead of hacking np.seterr() which could behave machine-dependently etc. Not a very nice fix though. Can we do better?

Edited by Ask Hjorth Larsen

Merge request reports