Follow-up from "Ensure processors that should only act on opened resources correctly filter resources based on their state"
The following discussion from !177 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@alberts-gitlab started a discussion: It feels like this should be
#resource_open?
, to indicate open resources.resource_opened?
sounds like it was a*.open
event.def resource_open? state == 'opened' end
The state
opened
seems like it should beopen
, but that's what the API gives so🤷 .