Fixed note buttons spacing on issues

What does this MR do and why?

The buttons on the note form didn't have any spacing when on mobile.

This MR fixes it.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Issues

Size	Old	New
Mobile
Desktop

Merge request (no changes)

Size	Old	New
Mobile
Desktop

How to set up and validate locally

1. Navigate to any issue where you can add a note
2. Find or create an existing note
3. Try to add a note to that note to create a thread
4. The Reply and Cancel buttons should have some spacing when on mobile

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

added 1 deleted label

Hey @zillemarco!

Thank you for your contribution to GitLab. Please refer to the contribution flow documentation for a quick overview of the process, and the merge request (MR) guidelines for the detailed process.

When you're ready for a first review, post @gitlab-bot ready. If you know a relevant reviewer(s) (for example, someone that was involved in a related issue), you can also assign them directly with @gitlab-bot ready @user1 @user2.

At any time, if you need help moving the MR forward, feel free to post @gitlab-bot help. Read more on how to get help.

To enable automated checks on your MR, please configure Danger for your fork.

You can comment @gitlab-bot label <label1> <label2> to add labels to your MR. Please see the list of allowed labels in the label command documentation.

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

added Community contribution workflowin dev labels

assigned to @zillemarco

	4 Warnings
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.
	Please add a merge request subtype to this merge request.
	Please add a merge request type to this merge request.
	This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Mireya Andres (@mgandres) (UTC+8)	Robert Hunt (@rob.hunt) (UTC+1)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

@gitlab-bot label typebug bugmobile

added bugmobile typebug labels

Hi @agulina If you have capacity, could you please review these few changes? Thanks a lot

@gitlab-bot ready @agulina

added workflowready for review label and removed workflowin dev label

requested review from @agulina

@agulina, this Community contribution is ready for review.

• Do you have capacity and domain expertise to review this? We are mindful of your time, so if you are not able to take this on, please re-assign to one or more other reviewers.
• Add the workflowin dev label if the merge request needs action from the author. This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

mentioned in issue gitlab-org/quality/triage-reports#8969 (closed)

Hey @rob.hunt,

would you have time to look at this merge request, please? Thanks!

requested review from @rob.hunt

@agulina, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, please start a new pipeline before merging.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

• rspec minimal jobs
• jest minimal jobs
• merging a merge request.

approved this merge request

mentioned in issue gitlab-org/quality/triage-reports#9014 (closed)

added workflowin review label and removed workflowready for review label

changed milestone to %15.4

added frontend label

	1 Warning
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Rahul Chanila (@rchanila) (UTC+10)	Robert Hunt (@rob.hunt) (UTC+1)
~"codeowners"	Reviewer review is optional for ~"codeowners"	Kamil Trzciński (@ayufan) (UTC+2)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits cc2b0027 and 0618fa54

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	3.51 MB	3.51 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	1.91 MB	1.91 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Note: We do not have exact data for cc2b0027. So we have used data from: 2f6a983d.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

merged

@zillemarco, how was your code review experience with this merge request? Please tell us how we can continue to iterate and improve:

1. Leave a or a on this comment to describe your experience.
2. Create a new comment starting with @gitlab-bot feedback below, and leave any additional feedback you have for us in the comment.

Have five minutes? Take our survey to give us even more feedback on how GitLab can improve the contributor experience.

Thanks for your help!

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

mentioned in commit 89b71369

added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowin review label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label

added groupproject management label

added devopsplan sectiondev labels

added Category:Issue Tracking label

added Category:Code Review Workflow label

added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label

added Leading Organization label and removed 1 deleted label

added releasedcandidate label

mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!1453 (merged)

added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label