Update Runner UI badges

changed milestone to %15.4

added GitLab Free Technical Writing UI text UX [Deprecated] Category:Runner Fleet design-weight2 devopsverify featureenhancement grouprunner sectionops severity4 typefeature workflowready for development + 1 deleted label

added frontend label

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 3ab70792 and 39ed0298

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	3.6 MB	3.6 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	1.98 MB	1.98 MB	-	0.0 %

Note: We do not have exact data for 3ab70792. So we have used data from: 254443d3.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

review-qa-blocking: test report for 9e7b4115

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                     suites summary                                      |
+------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                                    | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create                             | 28     | 0      | 1       | 6     | 29    | ❗     |
| Plan                               | 47     | 0      | 1       | 1     | 48    | ❗     |
| Manage                             | 46     | 0      | 3       | 14    | 49    | ❗     |
| Verify                             | 12     | 0      | 1       | 5     | 13    | ❗     |
| Secure                             | 2      | 0      | 0       | 2     | 2     | ❗     |
| Configure                          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Protect                            | 2      | 0      | 0       | 1     | 2     | ❗     |
| Version sanity check               | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Feature flag handler sanity checks | 9      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
| Package                            | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total                              | 146    | 0      | 9       | 29    | 155   | ❗     |
+------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-review-qa-blocking: test report for c5f76e3d

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                     suites summary                                      |
+------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                                    | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Manage                             | 57     | 0      | 3       | 31    | 60    | ❗     |
| Protect                            | 2      | 0      | 0       | 2     | 2     | ❗     |
| Plan                               | 47     | 0      | 1       | 30    | 48    | ❗     |
| Create                             | 28     | 0      | 1       | 16    | 29    | ❗     |
| Verify                             | 12     | 0      | 1       | 10    | 13    | ❗     |
| Secure                             | 2      | 0      | 0       | 2     | 2     | ❗     |
| Version sanity check               | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Package                            | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Feature flag handler sanity checks | 9      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
| Configure                          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total                              | 157    | 0      | 9       | 91    | 166   | ❗     |
+------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

added 91 commits

bd34f686...96065d6f - 90 commits from branch master
114beab8 - Update Runner UI badges

Compare with previous version

removed workflowready for development label

removed Technical Writing label

removed UI text label

added 71 commits

114beab8...3ab70792 - 70 commits from branch master
39ed0298 - Update Runner UI badges

Compare with previous version

assigned to @mrincon

changed the description

mentioned in issue #343133 (closed)

added 1022 commits

39ed0298...83ef92f9 - 1021 commits from branch master
8601afdf - Update Runner UI badges

Compare with previous version

	6 Warnings
	This MR changes code in `ee/`, but its Changelog commit is missing the `EE: true` trailer. Consider adding it to your Changelog commits.
	5fec5f28: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	41f3ee94: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	45b2cdee: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	featureaddition and featureenhancement merge requests normally have a documentation change. Consider adding a documentation update or confirming the documentation plan with the Technical Writer counterpart. For more information, see: The Handbook page on merge request types. The definition of done documentation.
	This merge request contains deprecated components. Please consider using Pajamas components instead.

Deprecated components

These deprecated components are in the process of being migrated. Please consider using Pajamas components instead.

.tooltip

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Fernando Arias (`@farias-gl`) (UTC+2, same timezone as `@mrincon`)	Anna Vovchenko (`@anna_vovchenko`) (UTC+3, 1 hour ahead of `@mrincon`)
test for `spec/features/*`	Aleksandr Lyubenkov (`@alyubenkov`) (UTC+2, same timezone as `@mrincon`)	Maintainer review is optional for test for `spec/features/*`
UX	Sascha Eggenberger (`@seggenberger`) (UTC+2, same timezone as `@mrincon`)	Maintainer review is optional for UX
~"group::authentication and authorization"	Reviewer review is optional for ~"group::authentication and authorization"	Drew Blessing (`@dblessing`) (UTC-5, 7 hours behind `@mrincon`)
~"codeowners"	Reviewer review is optional for ~"codeowners"	Andrejs Cunskis (`@acunskis`) (UTC+2, same timezone as `@mrincon`)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed

removed design-weight2 label

changed the description

@emilybauman can you help me review this UX change? Thanks!

requested review from @emilybauman

@eduardosanz can you help me with a review of this frontend change? I would like to assign to @markrian for some context on gl-badge.

requested review from @eduardosanz

@cwiesner can you help me review the Quality changes? Thanks!

requested review from @cwiesner

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 0f6fce38 and d79b121d

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	3.51 MB	3.51 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	1.91 MB	1.91 MB	-	0.0 %

Note: We do not have exact data for 0f6fce38. So we have used data from: b70d5d7a.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

Suggested Reviewers (beta)

The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.

You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign /assign_reviewer @user1.

Suggested Reviewers
`@gdoyle`, `@iamphill`, `@vitallium`, `@pedropombeiro`, `@rhardarson`

If you do not believe these suggestions are useful, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923.

Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot - an experimental ML-based recommendation engine created by ~"group::applied ml".

mentioned in merge request !95617 (merged)

removed review request for @cwiesner

mentioned in merge request gitlab-ui!2990 (closed)

Hey @mrincon - Thanks for the tag here!

I've checked this and the new UI Badges are showing up as expected! I'll go ahead and give my approval.

Non-Blocking: The upgrade recommended icon in the Runner Detail page seems to be touching the top and bottom of the badge. I couldn't find the proposed design for this in the connected issue so wanted to check if it is showing as expected @gdoyle.