Introduce work_items_hierarchy feature flag

changed milestone to %15.1

added Deliverable Next Up devopsplan frontend groupproduct planning sectiondev typefeature workflowin review labels

marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed

Suggested Reviewers (beta)

The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.

You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign /assign_reviewer @user1.

Suggested Reviewers
`@NikolayS`, `@kmann`, `@adriel`, `@npost`, `@rymai`

If you do not believe these suggestions are useful, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923.

Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot - an experimental ML-based recommendation engine created by ~"group::applied ml".

added 1 commit

57834304 - Introduce work_items_hierarchy feature flag

Compare with previous version

	1 Warning
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.

1 Message

CHANGELOG missing:

If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.

If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the EE: true trailer to your commit message.

If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	John Mason (`@john-mason`) (UTC-4, 14 hours behind `@fguibert`)	Charlie Ablett (`@cablett`) (UTC+12, 2 hours ahead of `@fguibert`)
frontend	Alper Akgun (`@a_akgun`) (UTC+3, 7 hours behind `@fguibert`)	Michael Lunøe (`@mlunoe`) (UTC+2, 8 hours behind `@fguibert`)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

Generated by Danger

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits e683bad5 and e7f899b1

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	3.46 MB	3.46 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	1.94 MB	1.94 MB	-	0.0 %

Note: We do not have exact data for e683bad5. So we have used data from: 7fb39cbc.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

review-qa-blocking: test report for e7f899b1

expand test summary

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                           |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
|                      | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | result |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Manage               | 36     | 0      | 2       | 38    | ❗     |
| Protect              | 2      | 0      | 0       | 2     | ❗     |
| Verify               | 12     | 0      | 1       | 12    | ❗     |
| Plan                 | 41     | 0      | 1       | 41    | ❗     |
| Package              | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
| Create               | 23     | 0      | 2       | 23    | ❗     |
| Configure            | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
| Version sanity check | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Total                | 114    | 0      | 9       | 116   | ❗     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+

package-and-qa-ff-enabled: test report for e7f899b1

expand test summary

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                           |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
|                      | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | result |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Manage               | 182    | 0      | 12      | 0     | ✅     |
| Create               | 295    | 1      | 14      | 3     | ❌     |
| Configure            | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | ➖     |
| Verify               | 76     | 0      | 6       | 5     | ❗     |
| Fulfillment          | 4      | 0      | 22      | 0     | ✅     |
| Plan                 | 106    | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
| Package              | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | ➖     |
| Secure               | 40     | 0      | 4       | 3     | ❗     |
| Version sanity check | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | ➖     |
| Release              | 12     | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
| Non-devops           | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
| Protect              | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Total                | 723    | 1      | 72      | 11    | ❌     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+

package-and-qa-ff-disabled: test report for e7f899b1

expand test summary

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                           |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
|                      | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | result |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Create               | 296    | 0      | 14      | 7     | ❗     |
| Configure            | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | ➖     |
| Manage               | 182    | 0      | 12      | 0     | ✅     |
| Verify               | 76     | 0      | 6       | 4     | ❗     |
| Plan                 | 106    | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
| Package              | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | ➖     |
| Secure               | 40     | 0      | 4       | 1     | ❗     |
| Release              | 12     | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
| Non-devops           | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
| Fulfillment          | 4      | 0      | 22      | 0     | ✅     |
| Protect              | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
| Version sanity check | 0      | 0      | 2       | 1     | ➖     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Total                | 724    | 0      | 72      | 13    | ❗     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+

@cngo Could you please review?

requested review from @cngo

The gitlab-qa-mirror downstream pipeline for !88504 (57834304) passed.
The gitlab-qa-mirror downstream pipeline for !88504 (57834304) passed.
The gitlab-qa-mirror downstream pipeline for !88504 (57834304) passed.
The gitlab-qa-mirror downstream pipeline for !88504 (57834304) passed.
The gitlab-qa-mirror downstream pipeline for !88504 (e7f899b1) passed.
The gitlab-qa-mirror downstream pipeline for !88504 (e7f899b1) failed!

approved this merge request

removed review request for @cngo

@cngo, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

added 211 commits

57834304...876b22bc - 210 commits from branch master
e7f899b1 - Introduce work_items_hierarchy feature flag

Compare with previous version

requested review from @kushalpandya

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

merged

@kushalpandya, did you forget to run a pipeline before you merged this work? Based on our code review process, if the latest pipeline finished more than 2 hours ago, you should:

Ensure the merge request is not in Draft status.
Start a pipeline (especially important for Community contribution merge requests).
Set the merge request to merge when pipeline succeeds.

(Improve this message?)