Omit tags when retrieving a list of registry repositories in a group
What does this MR do and why?
Update the API to only return a list of image repositories.
Closes #336912 (closed)
Screenshots or screen recordings
These are strongly recommended to assist reviewers and reduce the time to merge your change.
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
👋 @feistelThank you for your contribution to GitLab. We believe that everyone can contribute and contributions like yours are what make GitLab great!
- Our Merge Request Coaches will ensure your contribution is reviewed in a timely manner*.
- If you haven't, please set up a
DANGER_GITLAB_API_TOKEN
. - You can comment
@gitlab-bot label ~"group::"
to add a group label. - If you need help moving the MR forward or finding a reviewer, feel free to ask
@gitlab-bot help
or ping a Merge Request Coach. - Read more on how to get help.
- You can provide feedback on the GitLab Contributor Experience in this survey
This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.
added Community contribution label
assigned to @feistel
mentioned in issue #336912 (closed)
- Resolved by David Fernandez
Note: this is a breaking change and should be merged in %15.0, I'm gonna mark the MR as a draft to avoid merging by mistake.
- Resolved by David Fernandez
@sabrams thanks for adding the breaking change label!
This merge request introduces breaking changes. Learn more about breaking changes.
It's important to identify how the breaking change was introduced. To estimate the impact, try to assess the following:
- Are there existing users depending on this feature?
- Are self-managed customers affected?
- To verify and quantify usage, use Grafana or Kibana.
- If you're not sure about how to query the data, contact the infrastructure team on their Slack channel, #infrastructure-lounge
- Was sufficient time given to communicate the change?
- Changes in the permissions, the API schema, and the API response might affect existing 3rd party integrations.
- Reach out to the Support team or Technical Account Managers and ask about the possible impact of this change.
- Are there existing users depending on this feature?
changed milestone to %15.0
added Mechanical Sympathy Package:P1 Quality:performance-issues [deprecated] Accepting merge requests golang priority4 reliability severity4 typefeature workflowin dev labels and removed typebug label
removed [deprecated] Accepting merge requests label
added 2306 commits
-
e1203e35...ab059eb1 - 2305 commits from branch
gitlab-org:master
- c6c508f2 - Omit tags when retrieving a list of registry repositories in a group
-
e1203e35...ab059eb1 - 2305 commits from branch
added 1 commit
- 3649cbef - Omit tags when retrieving a list of registry repositories in a group
Hi @claytoncornell! Please review this documentation merge request.
added documentation twtriaged labels
requested review from @claytoncornell
added Technical Writing docsfix labels
- Resolved by Clayton Cornell
Suggested Reviewers (beta)
This is an experimental ML-based code reviewer recommendation system created by ~"group::applied ml".
The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.
After you review all recommendations, please assign reviewers manually, as this is not done automatically.
You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign
/assign_reviewer @user1
.Reviewers @stanhu
,@engwan
,@tkuah
,@mikolaj_wawrzyniak
,@mayra-cabrera
If you do not believe these recommendations are useful or if you do not want to use any of the suggestions, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923
.Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot
Edited by GitLab Reviewer-Recommender Bot1 Message 📖 This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge. Documentation review
The following files require a review from a technical writer:
doc/api/container_registry.md
The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:
-
Metadata for the
*.md
files that you've changed. The first few lines of each*.md
file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change. - The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
- Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend Valery Sizov ( @vsizov
) (UTC+1)Matthias Käppler ( @mkaeppler
) (UTC+2)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
Generated by
🚫 Danger- Resolved by David Fernandez
👋 @sabrams
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, please start a new pipeline before merging.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
requested review from @10io
- Resolved by feistel
- Resolved by David Fernandez
@feistel Are there any other doc changes pending here other than the stuff removed from the JSON example?
mentioned in merge request !86254 (merged)
removed review request for @claytoncornell
added 1023 commits
-
baa58470...4160a3b2 - 1022 commits from branch
gitlab-org:master
- 77f2bb76 - Omit tags when retrieving a list of registry repositories in a group
-
baa58470...4160a3b2 - 1022 commits from branch
added 1 commit
- 22d1c1e4 - Omit tags when retrieving a list of registry repositories in a group
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 3de7bc97 succeeds
@feistel, how was your code review experience with this merge request? Please tell us how we can continue to iterate and improve:
- Leave a
👍 or a👎 on this comment to describe your experience. - Create a new comment starting with
@gitlab-bot feedback
below, and leave any additional feedback you have for us in the comment.
Have five minutes? Take our survey to give us even more feedback on how GitLab can improve the contributor experience.
Thanks for your help!
❤ - Leave a
mentioned in commit d61759b2
added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowin dev label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added releasedcandidate label
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!1040 (merged)