Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Fix vulnerability list clearing when already-selected filter is clicked

Merged Daniel Tian requested to merge 356318-fix-vulnerability-list-clearing-incorrectly into master
All threads resolved!

What does this MR do and why?

This MR fixes an issue on the vulnerability report where clicking on an already-selected filter will cause the vulnerability list to incorrectly blank out:

Peek_2022-03-19_00-46

After the fix:

Peek_2022-03-19_00-44

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Related to #356318 (closed)

Edited by Daniel Tian

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Daniel Tian
  • Bundle size analysis [beta]

    This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits b23f636c and 654ea526

    :sparkles: Special assets

    Entrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent
    average 3.7 MB 3.7 MB +1.43 KB 0.0 %
    mainChunk 2.32 MB 2.32 MB - 0.0 %

    Note: We do not have exact data for b23f636c. So we have used data from: fed229f4.
    The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

    Please look at the full report for more details


    Read more about how this report works.

    Generated by :no_entry_sign: Danger

  • Daniel Tian
  • Daniel Tian
  • Daniel Tian requested review from @sming-gitlab

    requested review from @sming-gitlab

  • Allure report

    allure-report-publisher generated test report for 654ea526!

    review-qa-reliable: :pencil: test report
    review-qa-smoke: :pencil: test report

  • Samantha Ming approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Samantha Ming removed review request for @sming-gitlab

    removed review request for @sming-gitlab

  • :wave: @sming-gitlab, thanks for approving this merge request.

    This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.

    For more info, please refer to the following links:

  • 1 Warning
    :warning: This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone.

    Reviewer roulette

    Changes that require review have been detected!

    Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

    Category Reviewer Maintainer
    frontend Florie Guibert (@fguibert) (UTC+10, 20 hours ahead of @dftian) Frédéric Caplette (@f_caplette) (UTC-4, 6 hours ahead of @dftian)

    To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

    To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

    Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

    Generated by :no_entry_sign: Danger

  • Author Developer

    @ntepluhina Would you be able to do the maintainer review for this one? :bow:

  • Daniel Tian requested review from @ntepluhina

    requested review from @ntepluhina

  • Natalia Tepluhina resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • @dftian thanks for the fix and for adding a nice test coverage for it! :bow: LGTM :thumbsup_tone1:

  • Natalia Tepluhina approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Natalia Tepluhina enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for b5c7a05b succeeds

    enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for b5c7a05b succeeds

  • mentioned in commit ae7134ae

  • added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading