Vulnerability Report: Fix typo in description text

What does this MR do and why?

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why.

Screenshots or screen recordings

These are strongly recommended to assist reviewers and reduce the time to merge your change.

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

assigned to @dpisek

mentioned in commit ca29bc03

added 1 commit

• ca29bc03 - Vulnerability Report: Fix typo in description text

Compare with previous version

added frontend label

	3 Warnings
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the ~"type::tooling", ~"tooling::pipelines", ~"tooling::workflow", documentation, QA labels.
	Please add a merge request type to this merge request.
	This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Thomas Randolph (@thomasrandolph) (UTC-7, 18 hours behind @dpisek)	Illya Klymov (@xanf) (UTC+2, 9 hours behind @dpisek)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

added GitLab Ultimate devopsgovern groupthreat insights sectionsec labels

added Technical Writing label

@rdickenson - Can you please review from a Technical Writing perspective?

mentioned in issue #339730 (closed)

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits bf668226 and ebb1d629

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	3.24 MB	3.24 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	1.89 MB	1.89 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Note: We do not have exact data for bf668226. So we have used data from: 1dd2194d.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report for ebb1d629!

review-qa-smoke: test report

added tw-weight1 label

added twfinished label

approved this merge request

@rdickenson, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

• rspec minimal jobs
• jest minimal jobs
• merging a merge request.

resolved all threads

mentioned in commit cfac1fef

added 1 commit

• cfac1fef - Vulnerability Report: Fix typo in description text

Compare with previous version

mentioned in commit ebb1d629

added 1 commit

• ebb1d629 - Vulnerability Report: Fix typo in description text

Compare with previous version