E2E: Skip bulk import UI spec on slow network connection
What does this MR do and why?
Describe in detail what your merge request does and why.
I was not able to reproduce the issue manually with same throttling settings which leads me to believe it's some strange intermittent test issue.
Gitlab to Gitlab migration is a very administrative task, so I doubt it's a valid usecase to perform it on a 32kb/s connection with additional 2s of latency, so just setting this test to be skipped on a slow network configuration.
Closes: #340903 (closed)
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %14.4
added Quality test typemaintenance + 1 deleted label
assigned to @acunskis
added typefeature label
- A deleted user
added QA label
1 Message CHANGELOG missing: If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the
Changelog
trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the
EE: true
trailer to your commit message.If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer QA Tiffany Rea ( @treagitlab
) (UTC-7, 10 hours behind@acunskis
)Sanad Liaquat ( @sliaquat
) (UTC+5, 2 hours ahead of@acunskis
)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Dangeradded 66 commits
-
e46ac675...6b755868 - 65 commits from branch
master
- cada3d92 - Handle slow network connectio for import trigger
-
e46ac675...6b755868 - 65 commits from branch
added 17 commits
-
cada3d92...2b719bdf - 16 commits from branch
master
- 2e2e9e7e - Handle slow network connectio for import trigger
-
cada3d92...2b719bdf - 16 commits from branch
Allure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report for c14acec3!package-and-qa:
test report
review-qa-smoke: test report
review-qa-all: test reportadded sectiondev label
added 1 commit
- c14acec3 - Skip import UI test on slow network configuration
Failure in ee:praefect 8/10
There was an error running gitlab-ctl reconfigure: runit_service[logrotate] (logrotate::enable line 19) had an error: Mixlib::ShellOut::ShellCommandFailed: ruby_block[restart_log_service] (/opt/gitlab/embedded/cookbooks/cache/cookbooks/runit/libraries/provider_runit_service.rb line 65) had an error: Mixlib::ShellOut::ShellCommandFailed: Expected process to exit with [0], but received '1'
Doesn't relate to change here.
The
package-and-qa
job from pipeline https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/pipelines/379635956 triggered https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/-/pipelines/379648222 downstream.The
qa-test
job from pipeline https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/build/omnibus-gitlab-mirror/-/pipelines/379648222 triggered https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-qa-mirror/-/pipelines/379664992 downstream.The
gitlab-qa
downstream pipeline failed! .
marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed
- Resolved by Andrejs Cunskis
@treagitlab Could You please review this small change? Reasoning in the MR description.
requested review from @treagitlab
@treagitlab
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for c961d713 succeeds
mentioned in commit 7eee74a6
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
mentioned in issue #340903 (closed)
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowcanary label
added releasedcandidate label
removed typefeature label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label
added groupimport and integrate label and removed 1 deleted label