Bump swagger-ui-dist to 3.52.3
What does this MR do and why?
Bump swagger-ui-dist to 3.52.3 similar to !55310 (merged)
- https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-ui/compare/v3.44.1...v3.52.3
- https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-ui/releases
Screenshots or screen recordings
These are strongly recommended to assist reviewers and reduce the time to merge your change.
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
Thank you for your contribution to GitLab. We believe that everyone can contribute and contributions like yours are what make GitLab great!
- Our Merge Request Coaches will ensure your contribution is reviewed in a timely manner*.
- If you haven't, please set up a
DANGER_GITLAB_API_TOKEN
. - You can comment
@gitlab-bot label ~"group::"
to add a group label. - After a few days, feel free to ask
@gitlab-bot help
or ping a Merge Request Coach. - Read more how to get help.
This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.
added Community contribution label
- Resolved by Jacques Erasmus
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend Thomas Randolph ( @thomasrandolph
) (UTC-6)Jose Ivan Vargas ( @jivanvl
) (UTC-5)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Danger
mentioned in issue gitlab-org/quality/triage-reports#4672 (closed)
added devopscreate frontend groupsource code sectiondev typemaintenance labels
added typefeature label
Setting label(s) Category:Source Code Management based on groupsource code.
added Category:Source Code Management label
mentioned in issue gitlab-org/quality/triage-reports#4698 (closed)
@gitlab-bot help
Thanks for reaching out for help. I've notified the merge request coaches
They will get back to you as soon as they can.
If you have not received any response, you may ask for help again after 1 day.
mentioned in issue gitlab-org/quality/triage-reports#4882 (closed)
- Resolved by Jacques Erasmus
@andr3 can this be assigned for a FE review?
requested review from @jerasmus
assigned to @bufferoverflow
Looks good to me, thanks for the contribution @bufferoverflow!
- Resolved by Jacques Erasmus
@jerasmus
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, please start a new pipeline before merging.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
changed milestone to %14.4
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 63ebf200 succeeds
Bundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits e905f975 and 2d5caeba
Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent mainChunk 1.88 MB 1.85 MB -35.29 KB -1.8 % average 3.21 MB 3.21 MB -6.21 KB -0.2 % Significant Growth: 109Expand
Entrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent pages.groups.wikis 143.1 KB 1.28 MB +1.14 MB 814.8 % pages.projects.on_demand_scans.index 779.22 KB 1.72 MB +978.6 KB 125.6 % pages.projects.threat_monitoring.show 1.56 MB 2.17 MB +625.82 KB 39.1 % pages.projects.wikis 824.13 KB 1.33 MB +540.64 KB 65.6 % pages.projects.packages.packages.index 770.72 KB 944.92 KB +174.2 KB 22.6 % pages.groups.packages.index 23.1 KB 175.05 KB +151.95 KB 657.7 % pages.projects.packages.infrastructure_registry.show 1.16 MB 1.21 MB +57.59 KB 4.9 % pages.projects.snippets.show 1.39 MB 1.43 MB +40.09 KB 2.8 % pages.projects.commit.show 1.36 MB 1.4 MB +39.56 KB 2.8 % pages.projects.blob.show 1.21 MB 1.24 MB +31.8 KB 2.6 % The table above is limited to 10 entries. Please look at the full report for more details
New entry points: 4Expand
Entrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent pages.projects.threat_monitoring.edit 0 Bytes 1.62 MB +1.62 MB 100.0 % pages.projects.threat_monitoring.new 0 Bytes 1.62 MB +1.62 MB 100.0 % pages.shared.wikis 0 Bytes 1.22 MB +1.22 MB 100.0 % pages.admin.serverless.domains 0 Bytes 19.23 KB +19.23 KB 100.0 % Significant Reduction: 38Expand
Entrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent pages.admin.clusters.index 1.07 MB 232.02 KB -861.38 KB -78.8 % pages.groups.clusters.index 1.09 MB 292.23 KB -828.77 KB -73.9 % pages.groups.epics.new 1.61 MB 1.32 MB -299.03 KB -18.1 % pages.profiles.two_factor_auths 423.7 KB 325.81 KB -97.89 KB -23.1 % pages.profiles.personal_access_tokens 341.43 KB 249.77 KB -91.67 KB -26.8 % pages.profiles 281.38 KB 189.95 KB -91.43 KB -32.5 % pages.profiles.slacks 289.17 KB 197.74 KB -91.43 KB -31.6 % pages.profiles.preferences.show 295.44 KB 206 KB -89.44 KB -30.3 % pages.profiles.show 1.1 MB 1.02 MB -81.83 KB -7.3 % pages.projects.pipelines.builds 3 MB 2.94 MB -61.79 KB -2.0 % The table above is limited to 10 entries. Please look at the full report for more details
Your MR has at least one entrypoint growing significantly (more > 1 KB or 2%). If you write new or extend existing features, this is expected and there is nothing to worry about.
Please consider pinging someone from the FE Foundations (
@dmishunov
,@justin_ho
,@mikegreiling
or@nmezzopera
) for review, if you are unsure about the size increase.Note: We do not have exact data for e905f975. So we have used data from: 4fe41b1e.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
DangerAllure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report for 2d5caeba!review-qa-smoke:
test reportmentioned in commit d0604b03
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowcanary label
added releasedcandidate label
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!306 (merged)
removed typefeature label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label