Add line about processing delay to test coverage visualization docs
What does this MR do?
Adding a line about files being parsed in a background job.
Related issues
Doing this to answer questions from #340020 (closed)
Author's checklist
-
Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course -
Follow the: -
Ensure that the product tier badge is added to topic's h1
. -
Request a review based on: - The documentation page's metadata.
- The associated Technical Writer.
If you are only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:
~"feature"
~"frontend"
~"backend"
~"bug"
~"database"
These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
Review checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the above reviews. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review. -
Ensure a release milestone is set.
Merge request reports
Activity
assigned to @jheimbuck_gl
requested review from @eread, @iamricecake, and @shampton
- Resolved by Evan Read
@iamricecake @shampton @eread Can you take a look at this small change when you have a chance? Thanks!
mentioned in issue #340020 (closed)
1 Warning 3e411bc2: The commit subject must start with a capital letter. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines. 1 Message This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge. Documentation review
The following files require a review from a technical writer:
doc/user/project/merge_requests/test_coverage_visualization.md
The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:
-
Metadata for the
*.md
files that you've changed. The first few lines of each*.md
file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change. - The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
- Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Danger- Resolved by James Heimbuck
changed milestone to %14.3
added Technical Writing docsimprovement tw-weight1 twdoing labels
removed review request for @eread
@eread
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
mentioned in commit 87c9ce3a
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowcanary label
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label
added typemaintenance label