Reuse existing DastSiteToken if it already exists

What does this MR do?

this merge request uses an existing dast_site_token from the database rather than creating a new one every time a user tries to validate their dast_site_profile. this improves usability and, since dast site validation is a "foot gun" rather than a security feature, this change is not detrimental.

Related Issue(s)

DAST On-Demand - Opening validation modal should not always create a new validation token

Follow-up Issue(s)

• DAST On-Demand Add uniqueness constraint to DastSiteToken#url (follow-up issue)
• DAST On-Demand Add uniqueness constraint to DastSiteToken#token (follow-up issue)

Screenshots or Screencasts (strongly suggested)

How to setup and validate locally (strongly suggested)

please follow the documentation guidance.

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

Conformity

• I have included changelog trailers, or none are needed. (Does this MR need a changelog?)
• I have added/updated documentation, or it's not needed. (Is documentation required?)
• I have properly separated EE content from FOSS, or this MR is FOSS only. (Where should EE code go?)
• I have added information for database reviewers in the MR description, or it's not needed. (Does this MR have database related changes?)
• I have self-reviewed this MR per code review guidelines.
• This MR does not harm performance, or I have asked a reviewer to help assess the performance impact. (Merge request performance guidelines)
• I have followed the style guides.
• This change is backwards compatible across updates, or this does not apply.

Availability and Testing

• I have added/updated tests following the Testing Guide, or it's not needed. (Consider all test levels. See the Test Planning Process.)
• I have tested this MR in all supported browsers, or it's not needed.
• I have informed the Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change per definition of done, or it's not needed.

Security

Does this MR contain changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods or other items described in the security review guidelines? If not, then delete this Security section.

• Label as security and @ mention @gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec
• The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods
• Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team